Part 63 (2/2)
Ignorance sees nothing necessary, and is self abandoned to a power tyrannical because defined by no rule, and paradoxical because permitting evil, while itself a.s.sumed to be unlimited, all-powerful, and perfectly good. A little knowledge, presuming the identification of the Supreme Cause with the inevitable certainty of perfect reason, but omitting the a.n.a.lysis or interpretation of it, leaves the mind chain-bound in the ascetic fatalism of the Stoic. Free-will, coupled with the universal rule of Chance; or Fatalism and Necessity, coupled with Omniscience and fixed and unalterable Law,--these are the alternatives, between which the human mind has eternally vacillated.
The Supernaturalists, contemplating a Being acting through impulse, though with superhuman wisdom, and considering the best courtier to be the most favored subject, combines contradictory expedients, inconsistently mixing the a.s.sertion of free action with the enervating service of pet.i.tion; while he admits, in the words of a learned archbishop, that ”if the production of the things we ask for depend on antecedent, natural, and necessary causes, our desires will be answered no less by the omission than the offering of prayers, which, therefore, are a vain thing.”
The last stage is that in which the religion of action is made legitimate through comprehension of its proper objects and conditions.
Man becomes morally free only when both notions, that of Chance and that of incomprehensible Necessity, are displaced by that of Law. Law, as applied to the Universe, means that universal, providential pre-arrangement, whose conditions can be discerned and discretionally acted on by human intelligence. The sense of freedom arises when the individual independence develops itself according to its own laws, without external collisions or hindrance; that of constraint, where it is thwarted or confined by other Natures, or where, by combination of external forces, the individual force is compelled into a new direction.
Moral choice would not exist safely, or even at all, unless it were bounded by conditions determining its preferences. Duty supposes a rule both intelligible and certain, since an uncertain rule would be unintelligible, and if unintelligible, there could be no responsibility.
No law that is unknown can be obligatory; and that Roman Emperor was justly execrated, who pretended to promulgate his penal laws, by putting them up at such a height that none could read them.
Man commands results, only by selecting among the contingent the pre-ordained results most suited to his purposes. In regard to absolute or divine morality, meaning the final cause or purpose of those comprehensive laws which often seem harsh to the individual, because inflexibly just and impartial to the universal, speculation must take refuge in faith; the immediate and obvious purpose often bearing so small a proportion to a wider and unknown one as to be relatively absorbed or lost. The rain that, unseasonable to me, ruins my hopes of an abundant crop, does so because it could not otherwise have blessed and prospered the crops of another kind of a whole neighboring district of country. The obvious purpose of a sudden storm of snow, or an unexpected change of wind, exposed to which I lose my life, bears small proportion to the great results which are to flow from that storm or wind over a whole continent. So always, of the good and ill which at first seemed irreconcilable and capriciously distributed, the one holds its ground, the other diminishes by being explained. In a world of a mult.i.tude of individuals, a world of action and exertion, a world affording, by the conflict of interests and the clas.h.i.+ng of pa.s.sions, any scope for the exercise of the manly and generous virtues, even Omnipotence cannot make it, that the comfort and convenience of one man alone shall always be consulted.
Thus the educated mind soon begins to appreciate the moral superiority of a system of law over one of capricious interference; and as the jumble of means and ends is brought into more intelligible perspective, partial or seeming good is cheerfully resigned for the disinterested and universal. Self-restraint is found not to imply self-sacrifice. The true meaning of what appeared to be Necessity is found to be, not arbitrary Power, but Strength and Force enlisted in the service of Intelligence.
G.o.d having made us men, and placed us in a world of change and eternal renovation, with ample capacity and abundant means for rational enjoyment, we learn that it is folly to repine because we are not angels, inhabiting a world in which change and the clas.h.i.+ng of interests and the conflicts of pa.s.sion are unknown.
The mystery of the world remains, but is sufficiently cleared up to inspire confidence. We are constrained to admit that if every man would but do the best in his power to do, and that which he knows he ought to do, we should need no better world than this. Man, surrounded by necessity, is free, not in a dogged determination of isolated will, because, though inevitably complying with nature's laws, he is able, proportionately to his knowledge, to modify, in regard to himself, the conditions of their action, and so to preserve an average uniformity between their forces and his own.
Such are some of the conflicting opinions of antiquity; and we have to some extent presented to you a picture of the Ancient Thought. Faithful, as far as it goes, it exhibits to us Man's Intellect ever struggling to pa.s.s beyond the narrow bounds of the circle in which its limited powers and its short vision confine it; and ever we find it travelling round the circle, like one lost in a wood, to meet the same unavoidable and insoluble difficulties. Science with her many instruments, Astronomy, particularly, with her telescope, Physics with the microscope, and Chemistry with its a.n.a.lyses and combinations, have greatly enlarged our ideas of the Deity, by discovering to us the vast extent of the Universe in both directions, its star-systems and its invisible swarms of minutest animal life; by acquainting us with the new and wonderful Force or Substance we call Electricity, apparently a link between Matter and Spirit: and still the Deity only becomes more incomprehensible to us than ever, and we find that in our speculations we but reproduce over and over again the Ancient Thought.
Where, then, amid all these conflicting opinions, is the True Word of a Mason?
My Brother, most of the questions which have thus tortured men's minds, it is not within the reach and grasp of the Human Intellect to understand; but without understanding, as we have explained to you heretofore, we may and must _believe_.
The True Word of a Mason is to be found in the concealed and profound meaning of the Ineffable Name of Deity, communicated by G.o.d to Moses; and which meaning was long lost by the very precautions taken to conceal it. The true p.r.o.nunciation of that name was in truth a secret, in which, however, was involved the far more profound secret of its meaning. In that meaning is included all the truth than can be known by us, in regard to the nature of G.o.d.
Long known as AL, AL SCHADAI, ALOHAYIM, and ADONAI; as the Chief or Commander of the Heavenly Armies; as the aggregate of the Forces [ALOHAYIM] of Nature; as the Mighty, the Victorious, the Rival of Bal and Osiris; as the Soul of Nature, Nature itself, a G.o.d that was but Man personified, a G.o.d with human pa.s.sions, the G.o.d of the Heathen with but a mere change of name, He a.s.sumes, in His communications to Moses, the name ???? [IHUH], and says to Him, ???? ??? ???? [AHIH ASHR AHIH], I AM WHAT I AM. Let us examine the esoteric or inner meaning of this Ineffable Name.
??? [HIH] is the imperfect tense of the verb To BE, of which ???? [HIHI]
is the present; ??? [AHI--? being the personal p.r.o.noun ”I” affixed] the first person, by apocope; and ??? [IHI] the third. The verb has the following forms: ... Preterite, 3d person, masculine singular, ???
[HIH], did exist, was; 3d person com. plural, ??? [HIU] ... Present, 3d pers. masc. sing. ???? [IHIH], once ???? [IHUA], by apocope ???,???
[AHI, IHI].. Infinitive, ???, ??? [HIH, HIU] ... Imperative, 2d pers.
masc. sing., ??? [HIH], fem. ??? [HUI] ... Participle, masc. sing., ???
[HUH], ENS--EXISTING .. EXISTENCE.
The verb is never used, as the mere logical copula or connecting word, _is, was_, etc., is used with the Greeks, Latins, and ourselves. It always implies _existence, actuality_. The _present_ form also includes the _future_ sense,... _shall_ or _may_ be or exist. And ??? and ??? [HUH and HUA] Chaldaic forms of the imperfect tense of the verb, are the same as the Hebrew ??? and ??? [HUH and HIH], and mean _was, existed, became_.
Now ??? and ??? [HUA and HIA] are the Personal p.r.o.noun [Masculine and Feminine], HE, SHE. Thus in Gen. iv. 20 we have the phrase, ??? ??? [HUA HIH], HE WAS: and in Lev. xxi. 9, ?? ???? ??? [ATH ABIH HIA], HER Father. This feminine p.r.o.noun, however, is often written ??? [HUA], and ??? [HiA] occurs only eleven times in the Pentateuch. Sometimes the feminine form means IT; but _that_ p.r.o.noun is generally in the masculine form.
When either ?,?,?, or ? [Yod, Vav, He, or Aleph] terminates a word, and has no vowel either immediately preceding or following it, it is often rejected; as in ?? [GI], for ??? [GIA], a valley.
So ???-??? [HUA-HIA], He-She, could properly be written ??-?? [Hu-HI]; or by transposition of the letters, common with the Talmudists, ??-??
[IH-UH], which is the Tetragrammaton or Ineffable Name.
In Gen. i. 27, it is said, ”So the ALHIM created man in His image: _in the image_ of ALHIM created He him: MALE and FEMALE created He them.”
Sometimes the word was thus expressed; triangularly:
<script>