Part 1 (1/2)

A Supplication for the Beggars.

by Simon Fish.

INTRODUCTION.

SIR THOMAS MORE, who at that time was but Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, was made Lord Chancellor in the room of Cardinal WOLSEY on Sunday, the 24th of October 1529.

The following undated work--the second of his controversial ones--was therefore written, printed and published prior to that day, and while as yet he held the lower dignity of the ducal Chancellors.h.i.+p.

-- The supplycacyon of soulys Made by syr Thomas More knyght councellour to our souerayn lorde the Kynge and chauncellour of hys Duchy of Lancaster.

-- Agaynst the supplycacyon of beggars.

At fol. xx. of this work occurs the following important pa.s.sage, which, while crediting the Reformers with a greater science in attack, and a more far-reaching design in their writings than they actually possessed: fixes with precision the year of the first distribution in England of SIMON FISH's _Supplicacyon for the Beggers_, and with that its sequence in our early Protestant printed literature--

For the techyng and prechyng of all whych thyngys / thys beggers proctour or rather the dyuels proctour with other beggers that la[c]k grace and nether beg nor lo[o]ke for none: bere all thys theyr malyce and wrathe to the churche of C[h]ryste. And seynge there ys no way for attaynyng theyr entent but one of the twayn / yat ys to wyt eyther playnly to wryte agaynst the fayth and the sacramentys (wheryn yf they gat them credence and obtaynyd / they then se[e] well the church must nedys fall therwyth) or els to labour agaynst the church alone / and get the clergye dystroyd / whereuppon they parceyue well that the fayth and sacramentes wo[u]ld not fayle to decay: they parceyuyng thys / haue therfore furste a.s.sayd the furst way all redy / sendyng forth Tyndals translacyon of the _new testament_ in such wyse handled as yt shuld haue bene the fountayn and well spryng of all theyr hole heresyes. For he had corrupted and purposely changed in many placys the text / wyth such wordys as he myght make yt seme to the vnlerned people / that the scripture affirmed theyr heresyes it selfe. Then cam sone after out in prynt _the dyaloge_ of freere Roy and frere Hyerome / _betwene ye father and ye sonne_ [_Preface dated Argentine_ (Strasburg), _31 August, 1527_] agaynst ye sacrament of ye aulter: and the blasphemouse boke entytled _the beryeng of the ma.s.se_ [i.e. _Rede me and be not wroth_ / printed at Strasburg early in 1528].

Then cam forth after Tyndals wykkyd boke of _Mammona_ [_Dated Marburg, 8 May 1528_] / and after that his more wykkyd boke of obydyence [_Dated Marburg, 2 October 1528_]. In whych bokys afore specyfyed they go forth playnly agaynst the fayth and holy sacramentis of Crystys church / and most especyally agaynst the blyssed sacrament of ye aulter / wyth as vylanous wordes as the wre[t]ches cou[l]d deuyse. But when they haue perceuyd by experyence yat good people abhorred theyr abomynable bokes: then they beyng therby lerned yat the furst way was not ye best for ye furtherance of theyr purpose / haue now determined them selfe to a.s.say the secunde way / that ys to witte yat forberynge to wryte so openly and dyrectly agaynste all the fayth and the sacramentys as good crysten men coulde not abyde the redyng / they wolde / wyth lyttell towchyng of theyre other heresyes / make one boke specially agaynst ye church and loke how that wold proue.

The previous controversial work produced by Sir THOMAS MORE had but recently appeared under the t.i.tle of

-- A dialoge of syr Thomas More knighte: one of the counsayll of oure souerayne lorde the kyng and chauncellor of hys duchy of Lancaster. Wherin be treatyd diuers matters / as of the veneration and worshyp of ymagys and relyques / prayng to sayntys / and goyng on pylgrymage. Wyth many othere thyngys touchyng the pestelent sect of Luther and Tyndale / by th[e] one begone in Saxony / and by th[e] other laboryd to be brought in to Englond.

[COLOPHON]. Emprynted at London at the sygne of the meremayd at Powlys gate next to chepe syde in the moneth of June the yere of our lord.

M.C.C.XXIX. _c.u.m priuilegio Regali._

Of this extraordinarily scarce first edition, there is a copy in the Corporation Library, London.

As Sir THOMAS MORE felt it necessary to write this second work, of the _Supplicacyon of Soulys, after_ he had composed his _Dialogue_ the printing of which was finished in June 1529; and as his _Supplicacyon_ certainly was written and published prior to his advancement on the 24th October following: it is conclusive that S. Fish's tract had not appeared _before_ he was writing the _Dialogue_, and therefore that the date of its distribution must by this internal evidence, be fixed as in the spring or summer of 1529; however that date may conflict with early testimony, such as incorrect lists of prohibited books, a.s.signing it to 1524, 1526, etc.

Yet JOHN FOX in his _Actes and Monumentes_, [Third Edition] _fol._ 987, _Ed._ 1576, states that was

”Throwen and scattered at the procession in Westminster vpon Candlemas day [? _2nd February 1529_] before kyng Henry the viij, for him to read and peruse.”

We have been unable to verify this procession at Westminster on this particular date, and think that if it had been so, Sir THOMAS MORE would have surely noticed to the _Supplicacyon_ while writing the _Dialogue_, the printing of which was in progress during the next four months. He may, however, have thought it necessary to write a special book against S.

FISH's tract, with its distinct line of attack as he has accurately stated it.

It will be seen from the Bibliography that this date of the Spring of 1529 quite harmonizes with those of the contemporary German and Latin translations; which, naturally, would be prompt. It is also not inconsistent with the following allusion at p. 30 to Cardinal WOLSEY's still holding the Lord Chancellors.h.i.+p.

-- And this is by the reason that the chief instrument of youre lawe ye[a]

the chief of your counsell and he whiche hath your swerde in his hond to whome also all the other instrumentes are obedient is alweys a spirituell man.

So much, then, as to the certain approximate date of the publication. FOX is quite wrong in a.s.suming as he does in the following paragraph that this work was the occasion of Bishop TONSTAL's _Prohibition_ of the 24th October 1526, _i.e._ more than two years previously.

After that the Clergye of England, and especially the Cardinall, vnderstoode these bookes of the _Beggars supplication_ aforesayd, to be strawne abroade in the streetes of London, and also before the kyng. The sayd Cardinall caused not onely his seruauntes diligently to attend to gather them vp, that they should not come into the kynges handes, but also when he vnderstode, that the king had receaued one or two of them, he came vnto the kynges Maiesty saying: ”If it shall please your grace, here are diuers seditious persons which haue scattered abroad books conteyning manifest errours and heresies” desiryng his grace to beware of them.

Whereupon the kyng putting his hand in his bosome, tooke out one of the bookes and deliuered it vnto the Cardinall. Then the Cardinall, together with the Byshops, consulted _&c._

_Eccles. Hist. &c., p. 900. Ed. 1576._

II.