Part 27 (2/2)

CHAPTER XV.

CONFLICTS FOR TRADE AND SUPREMACY

Modern Babylonia--History repeating itself--Babylonian Trade Route in Mesopotamia--Egyptian Supremacy in Syria--Mitanni and Babylonia--Bandits who plundered Caravans--Arabian Desert Trade Route opened--a.s.syrian and Elamite Struggles with Babylonia--Rapid Extension of a.s.syrian Empire--Hitt.i.tes control Western Trade Routes--Egypt's Nineteenth Dynasty Conquests--Campaigns of Rameses II--Egyptians and Hitt.i.tes become Allies--Babylonian Fears of a.s.syria--Shalmaneser's Triumphs--a.s.syria Supreme in Mesopotamia--Conquest of Babylonia--Fall of a Great King--Civil War in a.s.syria--Its Empire goes to pieces--Babylonian Wars with Elam--Revival of Babylonian Power--Invasions of a.s.syrians and Elamites--End of the Ka.s.site Dynasty--Babylonia contrasted with a.s.syria.

It is possible that during the present century Babylonia may once again become one of the great wheat-producing countries of the world.

A scheme of land reclamation has already been inaugurated by the construction of a great dam to control the distribution of the waters of the Euphrates, and, if it is energetically promoted on a generous scale in the years to come, the ancient ca.n.a.ls, which are used at present as caravan roads, may yet be utilized to make the whole country as fertile and prosperous as it was in ancient days. When that happy consummation is reached, new cities may grow up and flourish beside the ruins of the old centres of Babylonian culture.

With the revival of agriculture will come the revival of commerce.

Ancient trade routes will then be reopened, and the slow-travelling caravans supplanted by speedy trains. A beginning has already been made in this direction. The first modern commercial highway which is crossing the threshold of Babylonia's new Age is the German railway through Asia Minor, North Syria, and Mesopotamia to Baghdad.[407] It brings the land of Hammurabi into close touch with Europe, and will solve problems which engaged the attention of many rival monarchs for long centuries before the world knew aught of ”the glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome”.

These sudden and dramatic changes are causing history to repeat itself. Once again the great World Powers are evincing much concern regarding their respective ”spheres of influence” in Western Asia, and pressing together around the ancient land of Babylon. On the east, where the aggressive Elamites and Ka.s.sites were followed by the triumphant Persians and Medes, Russia and Britain have a.s.serted themselves as protectors of Persian territory, and the influence of Britain is supreme in the Persian Gulf. Turkey controls the land of the Hitt.i.tes, while Russia looms like a giant across the Armenian highlands; Turkey is also the governing power in Syria and Mesopotamia, which are being crossed by Germany's Baghdad railway.

France is constructing railways in Syria, and will control the ancient ”way of the Philistines”. Britain occupies Cyprus on the Mediterranean coast, and presides over the destinies of the ancient land of Egypt, which, during the brilliant Eighteenth Dynasty, extended its sphere of influence to the borders of Asia Minor. Once again, after the lapse of many centuries, international politics is being strongly influenced by the problems connected with the development of trade in Babylonia and its vicinity.

The history of the ancient rival States, which is being pieced together by modern excavators, is, in view of present-day political developments, invested with special interest to us. We have seen a.s.syria rising into prominence. It began to be a great Power when Egypt was supreme in the ”Western Land” (the land of the Amorites) as far north as the frontiers of Cappadocia. Under the Ka.s.site regime Babylonia's political influence had declined in Mesopotamia, but its cultural influence remained, for its language and script continued in use among traders and diplomatists.

At the beginning of the Pharaoh Akhenaton period, the supreme power in Mesopotamia was Mitanni. As the ally of Egypt it const.i.tuted a buffer state on the borders of North Syria, which prevented the southern expansion from Asia Minor of the Hitt.i.te confederacy and the western expansion of aggressive a.s.syria, while it also held in check the ambitions of Babylonia, which still claimed the ”land of the Amorites”. So long as Mitanni was maintained as a powerful kingdom the Syrian possessions of Egypt were easily held in control, and the Egyptian merchants enjoyed preferential treatment compared with those of Babylonia. But when Mitanni was overcome, and its territories were divided between the a.s.syrians and the Hitt.i.tes, the North Syrian Empire of Egypt went to pieces. A great struggle then ensued between the nations of western Asia for political supremacy in the ”land of the Amorites”.

Babylonia had been seriously handicapped by losing control of its western caravan road. Prior to the Ka.s.site period its influence was supreme in Mesopotamia and middle Syria; from the days of Sargon of Akkad and of Naram-Sin until the close of the Hammurabi Age its merchants had naught to fear from bandits or petty kings between the banks of the Euphrates and the Mediterranean coast. The city of Babylon had grown rich and powerful as the commercial metropolis of Western Asia.

Separated from the Delta frontier by the broad and perilous wastes of the Arabian desert, Babylonia traded with Egypt by an indirect route.

Its caravan road ran northward along the west bank of the Euphrates towards Haran, and then southward through Palestine. This was a long detour, but it was the only possible way.

During the early Ka.s.site Age the caravans from Babylon had to pa.s.s through the area controlled by Mitanni, which was therefore able to impose heavy duties and fill its coffers with Babylonian gold. Nor did the situation improve when the influence of Mitanni suffered decline in southern Mesopotamia. Indeed the difficulties under which traders operated were then still further increased, for the caravan roads were infested by plundering bands of ”Suti”, to whom references are made in the Tell-el-Amarna letters. These bandits defied all the great powers, and became so powerful that even the messengers sent from one king to another were liable to be robbed and murdered without discrimination.

When war broke out between powerful States they harried live stock and sacked towns in those areas which were left unprotected.

The ”Suti” were Arabians of Aramaean stock. What is known as the ”Third Semitic Migration” was in progress during this period. The nomads gave trouble to Babylonia and a.s.syria, and, penetrating Mesopotamia and Syria, sapped the power of Mitanni, until it was unable to resist the onslaughts of the a.s.syrians and the Hitt.i.tes.

The Aramaean tribes are referred to, at various periods and by various peoples, not only as the ”Suti”, but also as the ”Achlame”, the ”Arimi”, and the ”Khabiri”. Ultimately they were designated simply as ”Syrians”, and under that name became the hereditary enemies of the Hebrews, although Jacob was regarded as being of their stock: ”A Syrian ready to perish”, runs a Biblical reference, ”was my father (ancestor), and he went down into Egypt and sojourned there with a few, and became there a nation, great, mighty, and populous”.[408]

An heroic attempt was made by one of the Ka.s.site kings of Babylonia to afford protection to traders by stamping out brigandage between Arabia and Mesopotamia, and opening up a new and direct caravan road to Egypt across the Arabian desert. The monarch in question was Kadashman-Kharbe, the grandson of Ashur-uballit of a.s.syria. As we have seen, he combined forces with his distinguished and powerful kinsman, and laid a heavy hand on the ”Suti”. Then he dug wells and erected a chain of fortifications, like ”block-houses”, so that caravans might come and go without interruption, and merchants be freed from the imposts of petty kings whose territory they had to penetrate when travelling by the Haran route.

This bold scheme, however, was foredoomed to failure. It was shown scant favour by the Babylonian Ka.s.sites. No record survives to indicate the character of the agreement between Kadashman-Kharbe and Ashur-uballit, but there can be little doubt that it involved the abandonment by Babylonia of its historic claim upon Mesopotamia, or part of it, and the recognition of an a.s.syrian sphere of influence in that region. It was probably on account of his p.r.o.nounced pro-a.s.syrian tendencies that the Ka.s.sites murdered Kadashman-Kharbe, and set the pretender, known as ”the son of n.o.body”, on the throne for a brief period.

Kadashman-Kharbe's immediate successors recognized in a.s.syria a dangerous and unscrupulous rival, and resumed the struggle for the possession of Mesopotamia. The trade route across the Arabian desert had to be abandoned. Probably it required too great a force to keep it open. Then almost every fresh conquest achieved by a.s.syria involved it in war with Babylonia, which appears to have been ever waiting for a suitable opportunity to cripple its northern rival.

But a.s.syria was not the only power which Babylonia had to guard itself against. On its eastern frontier Elam was also panting for expansion.

Its chief caravan roads ran from Susa through a.s.syria towards Asia Minor, and through Babylonia towards the Phoenician coast. It was probably because its commerce was hampered by the growth of a.s.syrian power in the north, as Servia's commerce in our own day has been hampered by Austria, that it cherished dreams of conquering Babylonia.

In fact, as Ka.s.site influence suffered decline, one of the great problems of international politics was whether Elam or a.s.syria would enter into possession of the ancient lands of Sumer and Akkad.

Ashur-uballit's vigorous policy of a.s.syrian expansion was continued, as has been shown, by his son Bel-nirari. His grandson, Arik-den-ilu, conducted several successful campaigns, and penetrated westward as far as Haran, thus crossing the Babylonian caravan road. He captured great herds of cattle and flocks of sheep, which were transported to a.s.shur, and on one occasion carried away 250,000 prisoners.

Meanwhile Babylonia waged war with Elam. It is related that Khur-batila, King of Elam, sent a challenge to Kurigalzu III, a descendant of Kadashman-Kharbe, saying: ”Come hither; I will fight with thee”. The Babylonian monarch accepted the challenge, invaded the territory of his rival, and won a great victory. Deserted by his troops, the Elamite king was taken prisoner, and did not secure release until he had ceded a portion of his territory and consented to pay annual tribute to Babylonia.

Flushed with his success, the Ka.s.site king invaded a.s.syria when Adad-nirari I died and his son Arik-den-ilu came to the throne. He found, however, that the a.s.syrians were more powerful than the Elamites, and suffered defeat. His son, Na'zi-mar-ut'tash[409], also made an unsuccessful attempt to curb the growing power of the northern Power.

<script>