Part 17 (1/2)

92. Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., and Turken, A.U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychology Review 106: 52950.

93. Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., and Ky, K.N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature 365: 611.

94. For a review, see: Sch.e.l.lenberg, E.G. (2005). Music and cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 31720.

95. Barnett, S.M., and Ceci, S.J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128: 61237.

96. Sch.e.l.lenberg, E.G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science 15: 51114.

97. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., and Taub, E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270: 3057.

98. Gaser, C., and Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Neuroscience 23: 924045.

99. Neville, H.J., unpublished data, personal communication.

100. Rueda, M.R., Rothbart, M.K., McCandliss, B.D., Saccomanno, L., and Posner, M.I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 1493136.

101. Norton, A., Winner, E., Cronin, K., et al. (2005). Are there pre-existing neural, cognitive, or motoric markers for musical ability? Brain and Cognition 59: 12434.

102. Schlaug, G., Norton, A., Overy, K., and Winner, E. (2005). Effects of music training on the child's brain and cognitive development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1060: 21930.

103. Personal communication.

Chapter 7: WE ALL ACT LIKE DUALISTS: THE CONVERTER FUNCTION.

1. Barrett, J.L. (2004). Why Would Anyone Believe in G.o.d? Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

2. Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton.

4. Gelman, S.A., and Wellman, H.M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 38: 21344.

5. Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 547609.

6. Caramazza, A., and Shelton, J.R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 134.

7. Boyer, P., and Barrett, C. (2005). Evolved intuitive ontology: Integrating neural, behavioral and developmental aspects of domain-specificity. In Buss, D.M. (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 20023). New York: Wiley.

8. Barrett, H.C. (2005). Adaptations to predators and prey. In Buss (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 20023). New York: Wiley.

9. Coss, R.G., Guse, K.L., Poran, N.S., and Smith, D.G. (1993). Development of antisnake defenses in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi), II: Microevolutionary effects of relaxed selection from rattlesnakes. Behaviour 124: 13764.

10. Blumstein, D.T., Daniel, J.C., Griffin, A.S., and Evans, C.S. (2000). Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators. Behavioral Ecology 11: 52835.

11. Fox, R., and McDaniel, M. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218: 48687.

12. Schlottmann, A., and Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception 28: 110513.

13. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., and Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ”pure reason” in infancy. Cognition 72: 23767.

14. Csibra, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., and Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Psychology 27: 11133.

15. Gelman, S.A., Coley, J.D., Rosengren, K.S., Hartman, E., Pappas, A., and Keil, F.C. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 63: 1157.

16. Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes' Baby. New York: Basic Books.

17. Vonk, J., and Povinelli, D.J. (2006). Similarity and difference in the conceptual systems of primates: The un.o.bservability hypothesis. In Wa.s.serman, E., and Zentall, T. (eds.), Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 36387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18. Baillargeon, R.E., Spelke, E., and Wa.s.serman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition 20: 191208.

19. Spelke, E.S. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget's theory. In Carey, S., and Gelman, R. (eds.), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition (pp. 13369). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20. Spelke, E.S. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition 50: 44347.

21. Baillargeon. R. (2002). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy: A summary in eight lessons. In Goswami, U. (ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

22. Shultz, T.R., Altmann, E., and a.s.selin, J. (1986). Judging causal priority. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 4: 6774.

23. Kohler, W. (1925). The Mentality of Apes. New York: Liveright.

24. Tomasello, M. (1998). Uniquely primate, uniquely human. Developmental Science 1: 116.

25. Povinelli, D.J. (2000). Folk Physics for Apes: The Chimpanzee's Theory of How the World Works, rev. ed. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history and artifact concepts. Cognition 60: 129.

27. Moore, C.J., and Price, C.J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain 122: 94362.

28. Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Besson, M., Magnie, M.-N., and Von Cramon, D.Y. (2002). Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex 12: 111523.

29. Heider, F., and Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57: 24359.

30. Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition 70: 24172.

31. Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology 35: 144053.

32. Kelemen, D. (2003). British and American children's preference for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition. 88: 20121.

33. Kelemen, D. (1999). Function, goals, and intention: Children's teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 46168.

34. Gergely, G., and Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 28792.

35. Povinelli, D.J. (2004). Behind the ape's appearance: Escaping anthropocentrism in the study of other minds. Daedalus 133 (Winter): 2941.