Volume I Part 1 (1/2)
Letters of Horace Walpole.
by Horace Walpole.
Volume I.
INTRODUCTION.
It is creditable to our English n.o.bility, and a feature in their character that distinguishes them from their fellows of most other nations, that, from the first revival of learning, the study of literature has been extensively cultivated by men of high birth, even by many who did not require literary fame to secure them a lasting remembrance; and they have not contented themselves with showing their appreciation of intellectual excellence by their patronage of humbler scholars, but have themselves afforded examples to other labourers in the hive, taking upon themselves the toils, and earning no small nor undeserved share of the honours of authors.h.i.+p. The very earliest of our poets, Chaucer, must have been a man of gentle birth, since he was employed on emba.s.sies of importance, and was married to the daughter of a French knight of distinction, and sister of the d.u.c.h.ess of Lancaster.
The long civil wars of the fifteenth century prevented his having any immediate followers; but the sixteenth opened more propitiously. The conqueror of Flodden was also ”Surrey of the deathless lay”;[1] and from his time to the present day there is hardly a break in the long line of authors who have shown their feeling that n.o.ble birth and high position are no excuses for idleness, but that the highest rank gains additional ill.u.s.tration when it is shown to be united with brilliant talents worthily exercised. The earliest of our tragic poets was Sackville Earl of Dorset. The preux chevalier of Elizabeth's Court, the accomplished and high-minded Sidney, took up the lyre of Surrey: Lord St. Albans, more generally known by his family name of Bacon, ”took all learning for his province”; and, though peaceful studies were again for a while rudely interrupted by the ”dark deeds of horrid war,” the restoration of peace was, as it had been before, a signal for the resumption of their studies by many of the best-born of the land. Another Earl of Dorset displayed his hereditary talent not less than his martial gallantry.
Lord Roscommon well deserved the praises which Dryden and Pope, after his death, liberally bestowed. The great Lord Chancellor Clarendon devoted his declining years to a work of a grander cla.s.s, leaving us a History which will endure as long as the language itself; while ladies of the very highest rank, the d.u.c.h.ess of Newcastle and Lady Mary Wortley Montague, vindicated the claims of their s.e.x to share with their brethren the honours of poetical fame.
[Footnote 1: ”Lay of the Last Minstrel,” vi. 14.]
Among this n.o.ble and accomplished brotherhood the author of these letters is by general consent allowed to be ent.i.tled to no low place.
Horace Walpole, born in the autumn of 1717, was the youngest son of that wise minister, Sir Robert Walpole, who, though, as Burke afterwards described him, ”not a genius of the first cla.s.s,” yet by his adoption of, and resolute adherence to a policy of peace throughout the greater part of his administration, in which he was fortunately a.s.sisted by the concurrence of Fleury of France, contributed in no slight degree to the permanent establishment of the present dynasty on the throne. He received his education at the greatest of English schools, Eton, to which throughout his life he preserved a warm attachment; and where he gave a strong indication of his preference for peaceful studies and his judicious appreciation of intellectual ability, by selecting as his most intimate friend Thomas Gray, hereafter to achieve a poetical immortality by the Bard and the Elegy. From Eton they both went to Cambridge, and, when they quitted the University, in 1738, joined in a travelling tour through France and Italy. They continued companions for something more than two years; but at the end of that time they separated, and in the spring of 1741 Gray returned to England. The cause of their parting was never distinctly avowed; Walpole took the blame, if blame there was, on himself; but, in fact, it probably lay in an innate difference of disposition, and consequently of object. Walpole being fond of society, and, from his position as the Minister's son, naturally courted by many of the chief men in the different cities which they visited; while Gray was of a reserved character shunning the notice of strangers, and fixing his attention on more serious subjects than Walpole found attractive.
In the autumn of the same year Walpole himself returned home. He had become a member of Parliament at the General Election in the summer, and took his seat just in time to bear a part in the fierce contest which terminated in the dissolution of his father's Ministry. His maiden speech, almost the only one he ever made, was in defence of the character and policy of his father, who was no longer in the House of Commons to defend himself.[1] And the result of the conflict made no slight impression on his mind; but gave a colour to all his political views.
He began almost immediately to come forward as an author: not, however, as--
Obliged by hunger and request of friends;
for in his circ.u.mstances he was independent, and even opulent; but seeking to avenge his father by squibs on Mr. Pulteney (now Lord Bath), as having been the leader of the attacks on him, and on the new Ministry which had succeeded him. In one respect that age was a happy one for ministers and all connected with them. Pensions and preferments were distributed with a lavish hand; and, even while he was a schoolboy, he had received more than one ”patent place,” as such were called, in the Exchequer, to which before his father's resignation others were added, which after a time raised his income to above 5,000 a year, a fortune which in those times was exceeded by comparatively few, even of those regarded as wealthy. So rich, indeed, was he, that before he was thirty he was able to buy Strawberry Hill, ”a small house near Twickenham,” as he describes it at first, but which he gradually enlarged and embellished till it grew into something of a baronial castle on a small scale, somewhat as, under the affectionate diligence of a greater man, Abbotsford in the present century became one of the lions of the Tweed.
[Footnote 1: The speech was made March 23, 1742; but Sir Robert had resigned office, and been created Earl of Orford in the February preceding.]
From this time forth literary composition, with the acquisition of antiques and curiosities for the decoration of ”Strawberry” occupied the greater part of his life. He erected a printing press, publis.h.i.+ng not only most of his own writings, but some also of other authors, such as poems of Gray, with whom he kept up uninterrupted intercourse. But, in fact, his own works were sufficiently numerous to keep his printers fully employed. He was among the most voluminous writers of a voluminous age. In the course of the next twenty years he published seven volumes of memoirs of the last ten years of the reign of George II. and the first ten of George III.; five volumes of a work ent.i.tled ”Royal and n.o.ble Authors;” several more of ”Anecdotes of Painting;” ”The Mysterious Mother,” a tragedy; ”The Castle of Otranto,” a romance; and a small volume to which he gave the name of ”Historic Doubts on Richard III.” Of all these not one is devoid of merit. He more than once explains that the ”Memoirs” have no claim to the more respectable t.i.tle of ”History”; and he apologises for introducing anecdotes which might be thought inconsistent with what Macaulay brands as ”a vile phrase,” the dignity of history. He excuses this, which he looked on as a new feature in historical composition, on the ground that, if trifles, ”they are trifles relating to considerable people; such as all curious people have ever loved to read.” ”Such trifles,” he says, ”are valued, if relating to any reign one hundred and fifty years ago; and, if his book should live so long, these too might become acceptable.” Readers of the present day will not think such apology was needed. The value of his ”trifles”
has been proved in a much shorter time; for there is no subsequent historian of that period who has not been indebted to him for many particulars of which no other trustworthy record existed. Walpole had in a great degree a historical mind; and perhaps there are few works which show a keener critical insight into the value of old traditions than the ”Historic Doubts,” directed to establish, not, indeed, Richard's innocence of the crimes charged against him, but the fact that, with respect to many of them, his guilt has never been proved by any evidence which is not open to the gravest impeachment. His ”Royal and n.o.ble Authors,” and his ”Anecdotes of Painting” are full of entertainment, not unmixed with instruction. ”The Mysterious Mother” was never performed on the stage, nor is it calculated for representation; since he himself admits that the subject is disgusting. But dramas not intended for representation, and which therefore should perhaps be more fitly called dramatic poems, were a species of composition to which more than one writer of reputation had lately begun to turn their attention; though dramas not designed for the stage seem to most readers defective in their very conception, as lacking the stimulus which the intention of submitting them to the extemporaneous ocular judgement of the public can alone impart. Among such works, however, ”The Mysterious Mother” is admitted to rank high for vigorous description and poetic imagery. A greater popularity, which even at the present day has not wholly pa.s.sed away, since it is still occasionally reprinted, was achieved by ”The Castle of Otranto,” which, as he explains it in one of his letters, owed its origin to a dream. Novels had been a branch of literature which had slumbered for several years after the death of Defoe, but which the genius of Fielding and Smollett had again brought into fas.h.i.+on. But their tales purported to be pictures of the manners of the day. This was rather the forerunner of Mrs. Radcliffe's[1] weird tales of supernatural mystery, which for a time so engrossed the public attention as to lead that ”wicked wag,” Mr. George Coleman, to regard them as representatives of the cla.s.s, and to describe how--
A novel now is nothing more Than an old castle and a creaking door; A distant hovel; Clanking of chains, a gallery, a light, Old armour, and a phantom all in white, And there's a novel.
[Footnote 1: ”'The Castle of Otranto' was the father of that marvellous series which once overstocked the circulating library, and closed with Mrs. Radcliffe.”--D'Israeli, ”Curiosities of Literature,” ii. 115.]
He had published it anonymously as a tale that had been found in the library of an ancient family in the North of England; but it was not indebted solely to the mystery of its authors.h.i.+p for its favourable reception--since, after he acknowledged it as his own work in a second edition, the sale did not fall off. And it deserved success, for, though the day had pa.s.sed when even the most credulous could place any faith in swords that required a hundred men to lift, and helmets which could only fit the champion whose single strength could wield such a weapon, the style was lively and attractive, and the dialogue was eminently dramatic and sparkling.
But the interest of all these works has pa.s.sed away. The ”Memoirs” have served their turn as a guide and aid to more regular historians, and the composition which still keeps its author's fame alive is his Correspondence with some of his numerous friends, male and female, in England or abroad, which he maintained with an a.s.siduity which showed how pleasurable he found the task, while the care with which he secured the preservation of his letters, begging his correspondents to retain them, in case at any future time he should desire their return, proves that he antic.i.p.ated the possibility that they might hereafter be found interesting by other readers than to those to whom they were addressed.
But he did not suffer either his writings or the enrichment of ”Strawberry” with antiquarian treasures to engross the whole of his attention. For the first thirty years and more of his public life he was a zealous politician. And it is no slight proof how high was the reputation for sagacity and soundness of judgement which he enjoyed, that in the ministerial difficulties caused by Lord Chatham's illness, he was consulted by the leaders of more than one section of the Whig party, by Conway, the Duke of Bedford, the Duke of Grafton, Lord Holland, and others; that his advice more than once influenced their determinations; and that he himself drew more than one of the letters which pa.s.sed between them. Even the King himself was not ignorant of the weight he had in their counsels, and, on one occasion at least, condescended to avail himself of it for a solution of some of the embarra.s.sments with which their negotiations were beset.
But after a time his attendance in Parliament, which had never been very regular, grew wearisome and distasteful to him. At the General Election of 1768 he declined to offer himself again as a candidate for Lynn, which he had represented for several years. And henceforth his mornings were chiefly occupied with literature; the continuation of his Memoirs; discussion of literary subjects with Gibbon, Voltaire, Mason, and others, while his evenings were pa.s.sed in the society of his friends, a mode of enjoying his time in which he was eminently calculated to s.h.i.+ne, since abundant testimony has come down to us from many competent judges of the charm of his conversation; the liveliness of his disposition acting as a most attractive frame to the extent and variety of his information.
Among his distractions were his visits to France, which for some time were frequent. He had formed a somewhat singular intimacy with a blind old lady, the Marquise du Deffand, a lady whose character in her youth had been something less than doubtful, since she had been one of the Regent Duc d'Orleans's numerous mistresses; but who had retained in her old age much of the worldly acuteness and lively wit with which she had borne her part in that clever, shameless society. Her _salon_ was now the resort of many personages of the highest distinction, even of ladies themselves of the most unstained reputation, such as the d.u.c.h.esse de Choiseul; and the rumours or opinions which he heard in their company enabled him to enrich his letters to his friends at home with comments on the conduct of the French Parliament, of Maupeon, Maurepas, Turgot, and the King himself, which, in many instances, attest the shrewdness with which he estimated the real bearing of the events which were taking place, and antic.i.p.ated the possible character of some of those which were not unlikely to ensue.
Thus, with a mind which, to the end, was so active and so happily const.i.tuted as to be able to take an interest in everything around him, and, even when more than seventy years old, to make new friends to replace those who had dropped off, he pa.s.sed a long, a happy, and far from an useless life. When he was seventy-four he succeeded to his father's peerage, on the death of his elder brother; but he did not long enjoy the t.i.tle, by which, indeed, he was not very careful to be distinguished, and in the spring of 1797 he died, within a few months of his eightieth birthday.
A great writer of the last generation, whose studies were of a severer cast, and who, conscious perhaps of his own unfitness to s.h.i.+ne at the tea-table of fas.h.i.+onable ladies, was led by that feeling to undervalue the lighter social gifts which formed conspicuous ingredients in Walpole's character, has denounced him not only as frivolous in his tastes, but scarcely above mediocrity in his abilities (a sentence to which Scott's description of him as ”a man of great genius” may be successfully opposed); and is especially severe on what he terms his affectation in disclaiming the compliments bestowed on his learning by some of his friends. The expressed estimate of his acquirements and works which so offended Lord Macaulay was that ”there is n.o.body so superficial, that, except a little history, a little poetry, a little painting, and some divinity, he knew nothing; he had always lived in the busy world; had always loved pleasure; played loo till two or three in the morning; haunted auctions--in short, did not know so much astronomy as would carry him to Knightsbridge; not more physic than a physician; nor, in short, anything that is called science. If it were not that he laid up a little provision in summer, like the ant, he should be as ignorant as the people he lived with.”[1] In Lord Macaulay's view, Walpole was never less sincere than when p.r.o.nouncing such a judgement on his works. He sees in it nothing but an affectation, fis.h.i.+ng for further praises; and, fastening on his account of his ordinary occupations, he p.r.o.nounces that a man of fifty should be ashamed of playing loo till after midnight.
[Footnote 1: Letter to Mann, Feb. 6, 1760.]