Part 7 (2/2)
But we are only seeking in his works for evidence of the {129} matter of fact,--Is there any proof in the works of Tertullian that the invocation of saints formed a part of the doctrine and practice of the Catholic Church in his time[48]? His works will be found in the note, arranged under those two heads, as nearly as I can ascertain the preponderating sentiments of critics[49].
[Footnote 48: The reader, who may be induced to consult the work of the present Bishop of Lincoln, ent.i.tled, ”The Ecclesiastical History of the second and third Centuries, ill.u.s.trated from the writings of Tertullian,” will there find, in the examination and application of Tertullian's remains, the union of sound judgment, diligence in research, clearness of perception, acuteness in discovery, and great erudition mingled with charity.]
[Footnote 49: Works of Tertullian before he became a Montanist:--
Adversus Judaeos.
The Tract ad Martyres.
The two Books ad Nationes.
The Apology, and the Tract de Praescriptione Haereticorum.
The Tract de Testimonio Animae.
The Tracts de Patientia, de Oratione, de Baptismo, de Poenitentia.
The two books ad Uxorem.
Works written after he espoused Montanism:--
The Tracts de Spectaculis and de Idololatria, though others say these should be ranked among the first cla.s.s.
The Tracts de Corona, and de Fuga in persecutione, Scorpiace, and ad Scapulam.
The Tracts de Exhortatione Cast.i.tatis, de Monogamia, de Pudicitia, de Jejuniis, de Virginibus Velandis, de Pallio, the five books against Marcion, the Tracts adversus Valentinianos, de Carne Christi, de Resurrectione Carnis, adversus Hermogenem, de Anima, adversus Praxeam, de Cultu Foeminarum.]
I will detain you only by a very few quotations from this father.
In his Apology, sect. 30, we read this very remarkable pa.s.sage, ”We invoke the eternal G.o.d, the true G.o.d, the living G.o.d, for the safety of the emperor.... {130} Thither (heavenward) looking up, with hands extended, because they are innocent; with our head bare, because we are not ashamed; in fine, without a prompter, because it is from the heart; we Christians pray for all rulers a long life, a secure government, a safe home, brave armies, a faithful senate, a good people, a quiet world.... For these things I cannot ask in prayer from any other except Him from whom I know that I shall obtain; because both He is the one who alone grants, and I am the one whom it behoveth to obtain by prayer;--his servant, who looks to him alone, who for the sake of his religion am put to death, who offer to him a rich and a greater victim, which He has commanded; prayer from a chaste frame, from a harmless soul, from a holy spirit.... So, let hoofs dig into us, thus stretched forward to G.o.d, let crosses suspend us, let fires embrace us, let swords sever our necks from the body, let beasts rush upon us,--the very frame of mind of a praying Christian is prepared for every torment. This do, ye good presidents; tear ye away the soul that is praying for the emperor.” [Page 27.]
In the opening of his reflections on the Lord's Prayer, he says,--
”Let us consider therefore, beloved, in the first place, the heavenly wisdom in the precept of praying in secret, by which he required, in a man, faith to believe that both the sight and the hearing of the Omnipotent G.o.d is present under our roofs and in our secret places; and desired the lowliness of faith, that to Him alone, whom he believed to hear and to see every where, he would offer his wors.h.i.+p.” [Page 129.]
The only other reference which I will make, is to {131} the solemn declaration of Tertullian's Creed; the last clause of which, though in perfect accordance with the sentiments of his contemporaries, seems to have been regarded with hostile eyes by modern writers of the Church of Rome, because it decidedly bids us look to the day of judgment for the saints being taken to the enjoyment of heaven; and consequently implies that they cannot be properly invoked now.
”To profess now what we defend: By the rule of our faith we believe that G.o.d is altogether one, and no other than the Creator of the world, who produced all things out of nothing by his Word first of all sent down.
That that Word, called his Son, was variously seen by the patriarchs in the name of G.o.d; was always heard in the prophets; at length, borne by the spirit and power of G.o.d the Father into the Virgin Mary, was made flesh in her womb, was born of her, and was Jesus Christ. Afterwards He preached a new law and a new promise of the kingdom of heaven; wrought miracles, was crucified, rose again the third day, and, being taken up into heaven, sat on the right hand of the Father; and He sent in his own stead the power of the Holy Ghost, to guide believers; that He shall come with glory to take the saints to the enjoyment of eternal life and the heavenly promises, and to condemn the impious to eternal fire, making a reviving of both cla.s.ses with the restoration of the body.” [De Praescriptione Haereticorum, -- 13. p. 206.]
Some notice must here be taken of METHODIUS, a pious Christian, of the third century. A work (Methodius, Gl. Combes. Paris, 1644) {132} formerly attributed to him has been quoted in proof of the early invocation of saints; but the work, among many others, has been long ago allowed by the best Roman Catholic critics to be the production of a later age. (Fabricius, vol. vii. p. 268, and vol. x. p. 241.) Many homilies, purporting to have been delivered on the festival of our Lord's presentation in the temple, at so early a period, must be received as the works of a later age, because that feast began to be observed in the Church so late as the fifteenth year of Justinian, in the sixth century. Evidently, moreover, the theological language of the homily is of a period long subsequent to the date a.s.signed to Methodius.
In speaking of our blessed Saviour, for example, he employs expressions to guard against the Arian heresy, and makes extracts apparently from the Nicene creed, ”G.o.d of himself, and not by grace,” ”Very G.o.d of very G.o.d, very light of very light, who for us men and our salvation, &c.”
The general opinion indeed seems to be that this, and many other writings formerly ascribed to the first Methodius, were written by persons of a subsequent age, who either were of the same name or a.s.sumed his. Even were the work genuine, it would afford just as strong a demonstration that Methodius believed that the city of Jerusalem could hear his salutation, as that the saints could hear his prayer; for he addresses the same ”Hail” to Mary, Symeon, and the Holy City alike, calling it the ”earthly heaven.” [Greek: Chairois hae polis, ho epigeios ouranos.] {133}
SECTION V.--THE EVIDENCE OF ORIGEN.
<script>