Part I (Prima Pars) Part 94 (2/2)
So, then, it remains to be said, that, as regards this first beat.i.tude, which the angel could procure by his natural power, he was created already blessed. Because the angel does not acquire such beat.i.tude by any progressive action, as man does, but, as was observed above (Q. 58, AA. 3, 4), is straightway in possession thereof, owing to his natural dignity. But the angels did not have from the beginning of their creation that ultimate beat.i.tude which is beyond the power of nature; because such beat.i.tude is no part of their nature, but its end; and consequently they ought not to have it immediately from the beginning.
Reply Obj. 1: Beat.i.tude is there taken for that natural perfection which the angel had in the state of innocence.
Reply Obj. 2: The corporeal creature instantly in the beginning of its creation could not have the perfection to which it is brought by its operation; consequently, according to Augustine (Gen. ad. lit. v, 4, 23; viii, 3), the growing of plants from the earth did not take place at once among the first works, in which only the germinating power of the plants was bestowed upon the earth. In the same way, the angelic creature in the beginning of its existence had the perfection of its nature; but it did not have the perfection to which it had to come by its operation.
Reply Obj. 3: The angel has a twofold knowledge of the Word; the one which is natural, and the other according to glory. He has a natural knowledge whereby he knows the Word through a similitude thereof s.h.i.+ning in his nature; and he has a knowledge of glory whereby he knows the Word through His essence. By both kinds of knowledge the angel knows things in the Word; imperfectly by his natural knowledge, and perfectly by his knowledge of glory. Therefore the first knowledge of things in the Word was present to the angel from the outset of his creation; while the second was not, but only when the angels became blessed by turning to the good. And this is properly termed their morning knowledge.
_______________________
SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 62, Art. 2]
Whether an Angel Needs Grace in Order to Turn to G.o.d?
Objection 1: It would seem that the angel had no need of grace in order to turn to G.o.d. For, we have no need of grace for what we can accomplish naturally. But the angel naturally turns to G.o.d: because he loves G.o.d naturally, as is clear from what has been said (Q. 60, A. 5). Therefore an angel did not need grace in order to turn to G.o.d.
Obj. 2: Further, seemingly we need help only for difficult tasks. Now it was not a difficult task for the angel to turn to G.o.d; because there was no obstacle in him to such turning. Therefore the angel had no need of grace in order to turn to G.o.d.
Obj. 3: Further, to turn oneself to G.o.d is to dispose oneself for grace; hence it is said (Zech. 1:3): ”Turn ye to Me, and I will turn to you.” But we do not stand in need of grace in order to prepare ourselves for grace: for thus we should go on to infinity. Therefore the angel did not need grace to turn to G.o.d.
_On the contrary,_ It was by turning to G.o.d that the angel reached to beat.i.tude. If, then, he had needed no grace in order to turn to G.o.d, it would follow that he did not require grace in order to possess everlasting life. But this is contrary to the saying of the Apostle (Rom. 6:23): ”The grace of G.o.d is life everlasting.”
_I answer that,_ The angels stood in need of grace in order to turn to G.o.d, as the object of beat.i.tude. For, as was observed above (Q. 60, A. 2) the natural movement of the will is the principle of all things that we will. But the will's natural inclination is directed towards what is in keeping with its nature. Therefore, if there is anything which is above nature, the will cannot be inclined towards it, unless helped by some other supernatural principle. Thus it is clear that fire has a natural tendency to give forth heat, and to generate fire; whereas to generate flesh is beyond the natural power of fire; consequently, fire has no tendency thereto, except in so far as it is moved instrumentally by the nutritive soul.
Now it was shown above (Q. 12, AA. 4, 5), when we were treating of G.o.d's knowledge, that to see G.o.d in His essence, wherein the ultimate beat.i.tude of the rational creature consists, is beyond the nature of every created intellect. Consequently no rational creature can have the movement of the will directed towards such beat.i.tude, except it be moved thereto by a supernatural agent. This is what we call the help of grace. Therefore it must be said that an angel could not of his own will be turned to such beat.i.tude, except by the help of grace.
Reply Obj. 1: The angel loves G.o.d naturally, so far as G.o.d is the author of his natural being. But here we are speaking of turning to G.o.d, so far as G.o.d bestows beat.i.tude by the vision of His essence.
Reply Obj. 2: A thing is ”difficult” which is beyond a power; and this happens in two ways. First of all, because it is beyond the natural capacity of the power. Thus, if it can be attained by some help, it is said to be ”difficult”; but if it can in no way be attained, then it is ”impossible”; thus it is impossible for a man to fly. In another way a thing may be beyond the power, not according to the natural order of such power, but owing to some intervening hindrance; as to mount upwards is not contrary to the natural order of the motive power of the soul; because the soul, considered in itself, can be moved in any direction; but is hindered from so doing by the weight of the body; consequently it is difficult for a man to mount upwards. To be turned to his ultimate beat.i.tude is difficult for man, both because it is beyond his nature, and because he has a hindrance from the corruption of the body and infection of sin. But it is difficult for an angel, only because it is supernatural.
Reply Obj. 3: Every movement of the will towards G.o.d can be termed a conversion to G.o.d. And so there is a threefold turning to G.o.d. The first is by the perfect love of G.o.d; this belongs to the creature enjoying the possession of G.o.d; and for such conversion, consummate grace is required. The next turning to G.o.d is that which merits beat.i.tude; and for this there is required habitual grace, which is the principle of merit. The third conversion is that whereby a man disposes himself so that he may have grace; for this no habitual grace is required; but the operation of G.o.d, Who draws the soul towards Himself, according to Lament. 5:21: ”Convert us, O Lord, to Thee, and we shall be converted.” Hence it is clear that there is no need to go on to infinity.
_______________________
THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 62, Art. 3]
Whether the Angels Were Created in Grace?
Objection 1: It would seem that the angels were not created in grace.
For Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. ii, 8) that the angelic nature was first made without form, and was called ”heaven”: but afterwards it received its form, and was then called ”light.” But such formation comes from grace. Therefore they were not created in grace.
Obj. 2: Further, grace turns the rational creature towards G.o.d. If, therefore, the angel had been created in grace, no angel would ever have turned away from G.o.d.
Obj. 3: Further, grace comes midway between nature and glory. But the angels were not beatified in their creation. Therefore it seems that they were not created in grace; but that they were first created in nature only, and then received grace, and that last of all they were beatified.
_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xii, 9), ”Who wrought the good will of the angels? Who, save Him Who created them with His will, that is, with the pure love wherewith they cling to Him; at the same time building up their nature and bestowing grace on them?”
_I answer that,_ Although there are conflicting opinions on this point, some holding that the angels were created only in a natural state, while others maintain that they were created in grace; yet it seems more probable, and more in keeping with the sayings of holy men, that they were created in sanctifying grace. For we see that all things which, in the process of time, being created by the work of Divine Providence, were produced by the operation of G.o.d, were created in the first fas.h.i.+oning of things according to seedlike forms, as Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. viii, 3), such as trees, animals, and the rest. Now it is evident that sanctifying grace bears the same relation to beat.i.tude as the seedlike form in nature does to the natural effect; hence (1 John 3:9) grace is called the ”seed” of G.o.d. As, then, in Augustine's opinion it is contended that the seedlike forms of all natural effects were implanted in the creature when corporeally created, so straightway from the beginning the angels were created in grace.
Reply Obj. 1: Such absence of form in the angels can be understood either by comparison with their formation in glory; and so the absence of formation preceded formation by priority of time. Or else it can be understood of the formation according to grace: and so it did not precede in the order of time, but in the order of nature; as Augustine holds with regard to the formation of corporeal things (Gen. ad lit. i, 15).
<script>