Part II (Pars Prima Secundae) Part 178 (2/2)
_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), there is understood to be an effect of G.o.d's gratuitous will in whoever is said to have G.o.d's grace. Now it was stated (Q. 109, A. 1) that man is aided by G.o.d's gratuitous will in two ways: first, inasmuch as man's soul is moved by G.o.d to know or will or do something, and in this way the gratuitous effect in man is not a quality, but a movement of the soul; for ”motion is the act of the mover in the moved.” Secondly, man is helped by G.o.d's gratuitous will, inasmuch as a habitual gift is infused by G.o.d into the soul; and for this reason, that it is not fitting that G.o.d should provide less for those He loves, that they may acquire supernatural good, than for creatures, whom He loves that they may acquire natural good. Now He so provides for natural creatures, that not merely does He move them to their natural acts, but He bestows upon them certain forms and powers, which are the principles of acts, in order that they may of themselves be inclined to these movements, and thus the movements whereby they are moved by G.o.d become natural and easy to creatures, according to Wis. 8:1: ”she ... ordereth all things sweetly.” Much more therefore does He infuse into such as He moves towards the acquisition of supernatural good, certain forms or supernatural qualities, whereby they may be moved by Him sweetly and promptly to acquire eternal good; and thus the gift of grace is a quality.
Reply Obj. 1: Grace, as a quality, is said to act upon the soul, not after the manner of an efficient cause, but after the manner of a formal cause, as whiteness makes a thing white, and justice, just.
Reply Obj. 2: Every substance is either the nature of the thing whereof it is the substance or is a part of the nature, even as matter and form are called substance. And because grace is above human nature, it cannot be a substance or a substantial form, but is an accidental form of the soul. Now what is substantially in G.o.d, becomes accidental in the soul partic.i.p.ating the Divine goodness, as is clear in the case of knowledge. And thus because the soul partic.i.p.ates in the Divine goodness imperfectly, the partic.i.p.ation of the Divine goodness, which is grace, has its being in the soul in a less perfect way than the soul subsists in itself. Nevertheless, inasmuch as it is the expression or partic.i.p.ation of the Divine goodness, it is n.o.bler than the nature of the soul, though not in its mode of being.
Reply Obj. 3: As Boethius [*Pseudo-Bede, Sent. Phil. ex Artist.]
says, the ”being of an accident is to inhere.” Hence no accident is called being as if it had being, but because by it something is; hence it is said to belong to a being rather to be a being (Metaph.
vii, text. 2). And because to become and to be corrupted belong to what is, properly speaking, no accident comes into being or is corrupted, but is said to come into being and to be corrupted inasmuch as its subject begins or ceases to be in act with this accident. And thus grace is said to be created inasmuch as men are created with reference to it, i.e. are given a new being out of nothing, i.e. not from merits, according to Eph. 2:10, ”created in Jesus Christ in good works.”
________________________
THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 110, Art. 3]
Whether Grace Is the Same As Virtue?
Objection 1: It would seem that grace is the same as virtue. For Augustine says (De Spir. et Lit. xiv) that ”operating grace is faith that worketh by charity.” But faith that worketh by charity is a virtue. Therefore grace is a virtue.
Obj. 2: Further, what fits the definition, fits the defined. But the definitions of virtue given by saints and philosophers fit grace, since ”it makes its subject good, and his work good,” and ”it is a good quality of the mind, whereby we live righteously,” etc.
Therefore grace is virtue.
Obj. 3: Further, grace is a quality. Now it is clearly not in the _fourth_ species of quality; viz. _form_ which is the ”abiding figure of things,” since it does not belong to bodies. Nor is it in the _third,_ since it is not a ”pa.s.sion nor a pa.s.sion-like quality,”
which is in the sensitive part of the soul, as is proved in _Physic._ viii; and grace is princ.i.p.ally in the mind. Nor is it in the _second_ species, which is ”natural power” or ”impotence”; since grace is above nature and does not regard good and evil, as does natural power. Therefore it must be in the _first_ species which is ”habit”
or ”disposition.” Now habits of the mind are virtues; since even knowledge itself is a virtue after a manner, as stated above (Q. 57, AA. 1, 2). Therefore grace is the same as virtue.
_On the contrary,_ If grace is a virtue, it would seem before all to be one of the three theological virtues. But grace is neither faith nor hope, for these can be without sanctifying grace. Nor is it charity, since ”grace foreruns charity,” as Augustine says in his book on the _Predestination of the Saints_ (De Dono Persev. xvi).
Therefore grace is not virtue.
_I answer that,_ Some held that grace and virtue were identical in essence, and differed only logically--in the sense that we speak of grace inasmuch as it makes man pleasing to G.o.d, or is given gratuitously--and of virtue inasmuch as it empowers us to act rightly. And the Master seems to have thought this (Sent. ii, D 27).
But if anyone rightly considers the nature of virtue, this cannot hold, since, as the Philosopher says (Physic. vii, text. 17), ”virtue is disposition of what is perfect--and I call perfect what is disposed according to its nature.” Now from this it is clear that the virtue of a thing has reference to some pre-existing nature, from the fact that everything is disposed with reference to what befits its nature. But it is manifest that the virtues acquired by human acts of which we spoke above (Q. 55, seqq.) are dispositions, whereby a man is fittingly disposed with reference to the nature whereby he is a man; whereas infused virtues dispose man in a higher manner and towards a higher end, and consequently in relation to some higher nature, i.e. in relation to a partic.i.p.ation of the Divine Nature, according to 2 Pet. 1:4: ”He hath given us most great and most precious promises; that by these you may be made partakers of the Divine Nature.” And it is in respect of receiving this nature that we are said to be born again sons of G.o.d.
And thus, even as the natural light of reason is something besides the acquired virtues, which are ordained to this natural light, so also the light of grace which is a partic.i.p.ation of the Divine Nature is something besides the infused virtues which are derived from and are ordained to this light, hence the Apostle says (Eph. 5:8): ”For you were heretofore darkness, but now light in the Lord. Walk then as children of the light.” For as the acquired virtues enable a man to walk, in accordance with the natural light of reason, so do the infused virtues enable a man to walk as befits the light of grace.
Reply Obj. 1: Augustine calls ”faith that worketh by charity” grace, since the act of faith of him that worketh by charity is the first act by which sanctifying grace is manifested.
Reply Obj. 2: Good is placed in the definition of virtue with reference to its fitness with some pre-existing nature essential or partic.i.p.ated. Now good is not attributed to grace in this manner, but as to the root of goodness in man, as stated above.
Reply Obj. 3: Grace is reduced to the first species of quality; and yet it is not the same as virtue, but is a certain disposition which is presupposed to the infused virtues, as their principle and root.
________________________
FOURTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 110, Art. 4]
Whether Grace Is in the Essence of the Soul As in a Subject, or in One of the Powers?
Objection 1: It would seem that grace is not in the essence of the soul, as in a subject, but in one of the powers. For Augustine says (Hypognosticon iii [*Among the spurious works of St. Augustine]) that grace is related to the will or to the free will ”as a rider to his horse.” Now the will or the free will is a power, as stated above (I, Q. 83, A. 2). Hence grace is in a power of the soul, as in a subject.
<script>