Part III (Secunda Secundae) Part 21 (1/2)
Obj. 2: Further, on Eph. 4:31, ”Let blasphemy ... be put away from you,” a gloss says, ”that which is committed against G.o.d or the saints.” But confession of faith, seemingly, is not about other things than those pertaining to G.o.d, Who is the object of faith.
Therefore blasphemy is not always opposed to the confession of faith.
Obj. 3: Further, according to some, there are three kinds of blasphemy. The first of these is when something unfitting is affirmed of G.o.d; the second is when something fitting is denied of Him; and the third, when something proper to G.o.d is ascribed to a creature, so that, seemingly, blasphemy is not only about G.o.d, but also about His creatures. Now the object of faith is G.o.d. Therefore blasphemy is not opposed to confession of faith.
_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (1 Tim. 1:12, 13): ”I ...
before was a blasphemer and a persecutor,” and afterwards, ”I did it ignorantly in” my ”unbelief.” Hence it seems that blasphemy pertains to unbelief.
_I answer that,_ The word blasphemy seems to denote the disparagement of some surpa.s.sing goodness, especially that of G.o.d. Now G.o.d, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. i), is the very essence of true goodness.
Hence whatever befits G.o.d, pertains to His goodness, and whatever does not befit Him, is far removed from the perfection of goodness which is His Essence. Consequently whoever either denies anything befitting G.o.d, or affirms anything unbefitting Him, disparages the Divine goodness.
Now this may happen in two ways. In the first way it may happen merely in respect of the opinion in the intellect; in the second way this opinion is united to a certain detestation in the affections, even as, on the other hand, faith in G.o.d is perfected by love of Him.
Accordingly this disparagement of the Divine goodness is either in the intellect alone, or in the affections also. If it is in thought only, it is blasphemy of the heart, whereas if it betrays itself outwardly in speech it is blasphemy of the tongue. It is in this sense that blasphemy is opposed to confession of faith.
Reply Obj. 1: He that speaks against G.o.d, with the intention of reviling Him, disparages the Divine goodness, not only in respect of the falsehood in his intellect, but also by reason of the wickedness of his will, whereby he detests and strives to hinder the honor due to G.o.d, and this is perfect blasphemy.
Reply Obj. 2: Even as G.o.d is praised in His saints, in so far as praise is given to the works which G.o.d does in His saints, so does blasphemy against the saints, redound, as a consequence, against G.o.d.
Reply Obj. 3: Properly speaking, the sin of blasphemy is not in this way divided into three species: since to affirm unfitting things, or to deny fitting things of G.o.d, differ merely as affirmation and negation. For this diversity does not cause distinct species of habits, since the falsehood of affirmations and negations is made known by the same knowledge, and it is the same ignorance which errs in either way, since negatives are proved by affirmatives, according to Poster. i, 25. Again to ascribe to creatures things that are proper to G.o.d, seems to amount to the same as affirming something unfitting of Him, since whatever is proper to G.o.d is G.o.d Himself: and to ascribe to a creature, that which is proper to G.o.d, is to a.s.sert that G.o.d is the same as a creature.
_______________________
SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 13, Art. 2]
Whether Blasphemy Is Always a Mortal Sin?
Objection 1: It would seem that blasphemy is not always a mortal sin.
Because a gloss on the words, ”Now lay you also all away,” etc. (Col.
3:8) says: ”After prohibiting greater crimes he forbids lesser sins”: and yet among the latter he includes blasphemy. Therefore blasphemy is comprised among the lesser, i.e. venial, sins.
Obj. 2: Further, every mortal sin is opposed to one of the precepts of the decalogue. But, seemingly, blasphemy is not contrary to any of them. Therefore blasphemy is not a mortal sin.
Obj. 3: Further, sins committed without deliberation, are not mortal: hence first movements are not mortal sins, because they precede the deliberation of the reason, as was shown above (I-II, Q. 74, AA. 3, 10). Now blasphemy sometimes occurs without deliberation of the reason. Therefore it is not always a mortal sin.
_On the contrary,_ It is written (Lev. 24:16): ”He that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, dying let him die.” Now the death punishment is not inflicted except for a mortal sin. Therefore blasphemy is a mortal sin.
_I answer that,_ As stated above (I-II, Q. 72, A. 5), a mortal sin is one whereby a man is severed from the first principle of spiritual life, which principle is the charity of G.o.d. Therefore whatever things are contrary to charity, are mortal sins in respect of their genus. Now blasphemy, as to its genus, is opposed to Divine charity, because, as stated above (A. 1), it disparages the Divine goodness, which is the object of charity. Consequently blasphemy is a mortal sin, by reason of its genus.
Reply Obj. 1: This gloss is not to be understood as meaning that all the sins which follow, are mortal, but that whereas all those mentioned previously are more grievous sins, some of those mentioned afterwards are less grievous; and yet among the latter some more grievous sins are included.
Reply Obj. 2: Since, as stated above (A. 1), blasphemy is contrary to the confession of faith, its prohibition is comprised under the prohibition of unbelief, expressed by the words: ”I am the Lord thy G.o.d,” etc. (Ex. 20:1). Or else, it is forbidden by the words: ”Thou shalt not take the name of ... G.o.d in vain” (Ex. 20:7). Because he who a.s.serts something false about G.o.d, takes His name in vain even more than he who uses the name of G.o.d in confirmation of a falsehood.
Reply Obj. 3: There are two ways in which blasphemy may occur unawares and without deliberation. In the first way, by a man failing to advert to the blasphemous nature of his words, and this may happen through his being moved suddenly by pa.s.sion so as to break out into words suggested by his imagination, without heeding to the meaning of those words: this is a venial sin, and is not a blasphemy properly so called. In the second way, by adverting to the meaning of his words, and to their blasphemous nature: in which case he is not excused from mortal sin, even as neither is he who, in a sudden movement of anger, kills one who is sitting beside him.
_______________________
THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 13, Art. 3]
Whether the Sin of Blasphemy Is the Greatest Sin?
Objection 1: It would seem that the sin of blasphemy is not the greatest sin. For, according to Augustine (Enchiridion xii), a thing is said to be evil because it does harm. Now the sin of murder, since it destroys a man's life, does more harm than the sin of blasphemy, which can do no harm to G.o.d. Therefore the sin of murder is more grievous than that of blasphemy.