Part III (Secunda Secundae) Part 43 (1/2)
EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 25, Art. 8]
Whether Charity Requires That We Should Love Our Enemies?
Objection 1: It would seem that charity does not require us to love our enemies. For Augustine says (Enchiridion lxxiii) that ”this great good,” namely, the love of our enemies, is ”not so universal in its application, as the object of our pet.i.tion when we say: Forgive us our trespa.s.ses.” Now no one is forgiven sin without he have charity, because, according to Prov. 10:12, ”charity covereth all sins.”
Therefore charity does not require that we should love our enemies.
Obj. 2: Further, charity does not do away with nature. Now everything, even an irrational being, naturally hates its contrary, as a lamb hates a wolf, and water fire. Therefore charity does not make us love our enemies.
Obj. 3: Further, charity ”doth nothing perversely” (1 Cor. 13:4). Now it seems perverse to love one's enemies, as it would be to hate one's friends: hence Joab upbraided David by saying (2 Kings 19:6): ”Thou lovest them that hate thee, and thou hatest them that love thee.”
Therefore charity does not make us love our enemies.
_On the contrary,_ Our Lord said (Matt. 4:44): ”Love your enemies.”
_I answer that,_ Love of one's enemies may be understood in three ways. First, as though we were to love our enemies as such: this is perverse, and contrary to charity, since it implies love of that which is evil in another.
Secondly love of one's enemies may mean that we love them as to their nature, but in general: and in this sense charity requires that we should love our enemies, namely, that in loving G.o.d and our neighbor, we should not exclude our enemies from the love given to our neighbor in general.
Thirdly, love of one's enemies may be considered as specially directed to them, namely, that we should have a special movement of love towards our enemies. Charity does not require this absolutely, because it does not require that we should have a special movement of love to every individual man, since this would be impossible.
Nevertheless charity does require this, in respect of our being prepared in mind, namely, that we should be ready to love our enemies individually, if the necessity were to occur. That man should actually do so, and love his enemy for G.o.d's sake, without it being necessary for him to do so, belongs to the perfection of charity. For since man loves his neighbor, out of charity, for G.o.d's sake, the more he loves G.o.d, the more does he put enmities aside and show love towards his neighbor: thus if we loved a certain man very much, we would love his children though they were unfriendly towards us. This is the sense in which Augustine speaks in the pa.s.sage quoted in the First Objection, the Reply to which is therefore evident.
Reply Obj. 2: Everything naturally hates its contrary as such. Now our enemies are contrary to us, as enemies, wherefore this itself should be hateful to us, for their enmity should displease us. They are not, however, contrary to us, as men and capable of happiness: and it is as such that we are bound to love them.
Reply Obj. 3: It is wrong to love one's enemies as such: charity does not do this, as stated above.
_______________________
NINTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 25, Art. 9]
Whether It Is Necessary for Salvation That We Should Show Our Enemies the Signs and Effects of Love?
Objection 1: It would seem that charity demands of a man to show his enemy the signs or effects of love. For it is written (1 John 3:18): ”Let us not love in word nor in tongue, but in deed and in truth.”
Now a man loves in deed by showing the one he loves signs and effects of love. Therefore charity requires that a man show his enemies such signs and effects of love.
Obj. 2: Further, Our Lord said in the same breath (Matt. 5:44): ”Love your enemies,” and, ”Do good to them that hate you.” Now charity demands that we love our enemies. Therefore it demands also that we should ”do good to them.”
Obj. 3: Further, not only G.o.d but also our neighbor is the object of charity. Now Gregory says in a homily for Pentecost (In Evang. x.x.x), that ”love of G.o.d cannot be idle for wherever it is it does great things, and if it ceases to work, it is no longer love.” Hence charity towards our neighbor cannot be without producing works. But charity requires us to love our neighbor without exception, though he be an enemy. Therefore charity requires us to show the signs and effects of love towards our enemies.
_On the contrary,_ A gloss on Matt. 5:44, ”Do good to them that hate you,” says: ”To do good to one's enemies is the height of perfection”
[*Augustine, Enchiridion lxxiii]. Now charity does not require us to do that which belongs to its perfection. Therefore charity does not require us to show the signs and effects of love to our enemies.
_I answer that,_ The effects and signs of charity are the result of inward love, and are in proportion with it. Now it is absolutely necessary, for the fulfilment of the precept, that we should inwardly love our enemies in general, but not individually, except as regards the mind being prepared to do so, as explained above (A. 8).
We must accordingly apply this to the showing of the effects and signs of love. For some of the signs and favors of love are shown to our neighbors in general, as when we pray for all the faithful, or for a whole people, or when anyone bestows a favor on a whole community: and the fulfilment of the precept requires that we should show such like favors or signs of love towards our enemies. For if we did not so, it would be a proof of vengeful spite, and contrary to what is written (Lev. 19:18): ”Seek not revenge, nor be mindful of the injury of thy citizens.” But there are other favors or signs of love, which one shows to certain persons in particular: and it is not necessary for salvation that we show our enemies such like favors and signs of love, except as regards being ready in our minds, for instance to come to their a.s.sistance in a case of urgency, according to Prov. 25:21: ”If thy enemy be hungry, give him to eat; if he thirst, give him ... drink.” Outside cases of urgency, to show such like favors to an enemy belongs to the perfection of charity, whereby we not only beware, as in duty bound, of being overcome by evil, but also wish to overcome evil by good [*Rom. 12:21], which belongs to perfection: for then we not only beware of being drawn into hatred on account of the hurt done to us, but purpose to induce our enemy to love us on account of our kindliness.
This suffices for the Replies to the Objections.
_______________________
TENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 25, Art. 10]
Whether We Ought to Love the Angels Out of Charity?