Part IV (Tertia Pars) Part 12 (1/2)
Reply Obj. 1: From these words nothing may be gathered, except that the Word, by a.s.suming the parts of human nature, a.s.sumed the whole human nature. And thus the a.s.sumption of parts is prior in the order of the intellect, if we consider the operation, but not in order of time; whereas the a.s.sumption of the nature is prior if we consider the intention: and this is to be simply first, as was said above.
Reply Obj. 2: G.o.d is so simple that He is also most perfect; and hence the whole is more like to G.o.d than the parts, inasmuch as it is more perfect.
Reply Obj. 3: It is a personal union wherein the a.s.sumption is terminated, not a union of nature, which springs from a conjunction of parts.
_______________________
SIXTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 6, Art. 6]
Whether the Human Nature Was a.s.sumed Through the Medium of Grace?
Objection 1: It would seem that the Son of G.o.d a.s.sumed human nature through the medium of grace. For by grace we are united to G.o.d. But the human nature in Christ was most closely united to G.o.d. Therefore the union took place by grace.
Obj. 2: Further, as the body lives by the soul, which is its perfection, so does the soul by grace. But the human nature was fitted for the a.s.sumption by the soul. Therefore the Son of G.o.d a.s.sumed the soul through the medium of grace.
Obj. 3: Further, Augustine says (De Trin. xv, 11) that the incarnate Word is like our spoken word. But our word is united to our speech by means of _breathing_ (_spiritus_). Therefore the Word of G.o.d is united to flesh by means of the Holy Spirit, and hence by means of grace, which is attributed to the Holy Spirit, according to 1 Cor.
12:4: ”Now there are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit.”
_On the contrary,_ Grace is an accident in the soul, as was shown above (I-II, Q. 110, A. 2). Now the union of the Word with human nature took place in the subsistence, and not accidentally, as was shown above (Q. 2, A. 6). Therefore the human nature was not a.s.sumed by means of grace.
_I answer that,_ In Christ there was the grace of union and habitual grace. Therefore grace cannot be taken to be the medium of the a.s.sumption of the human nature, whether we speak of the grace of union or of habitual grace. For the grace of union is the personal being that is given gratis from above to the human nature in the Person of the Word, and is the term of the a.s.sumption. Whereas the habitual grace pertaining to the spiritual holiness of the man is an effect following the union, according to John 1:14: ”We saw His glory ... as it were of the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth”--by which we are given to understand that because this Man (as a result of the union) is the Only-begotten of the Father, He is full of grace and truth. But if by grace we understand the will of G.o.d doing or bestowing something gratis, the union took place by grace, not as a means, but as the efficient cause.
Reply Obj. 1: Our union with G.o.d is by operation, inasmuch as we know and love Him; and hence this union is by habitual grace, inasmuch as a perfect operation proceeds from a habit. Now the union of the human nature with the Word of G.o.d is in personal being, which depends not on any habit, but on the nature itself.
Reply Obj. 2: The soul is the substantial perfection of the body; grace is but an accidental perfection of the soul. Hence grace cannot ordain the soul to personal union, which is not accidental, as the soul ordains the body.
Reply Obj. 3: Our word is united to our speech, by means of breathing (_spiritus_), not as a formal medium, but as a moving medium. For from the word conceived within, the breathing proceeds, from which the speech is formed. And similarly from the eternal Word proceeds the Holy Spirit, Who formed the body of Christ, as will be shown (Q.
32, A. 1). But it does not follow from this that the grace of the Holy Spirit is the formal medium in the aforesaid union.
_______________________
QUESTION 7
OF THE GRACE OF CHRIST AS AN INDIVIDUAL MAN (In Thirteen Articles)
We must now consider such things as were co-a.s.sumed by the Son of G.o.d in human nature; and first what belongs to perfection; secondly, what belongs to defect.
Concerning the first, there are three points of consideration: (1) The grace of Christ; (2) His knowledge; (3) His power.
With regard to His grace we must consider two things: (1) His grace as He is an individual man; (2) His grace as He is the Head of the Church. Of the grace of union we have already spoken (Q. 2).
Under the first head there are thirteen points of inquiry:
(1) Whether in the soul of Christ there was any habitual grace?
(2) Whether in Christ there were virtues?
(3) Whether He had faith?
(4) Whether He had hope?
(5) Whether in Christ there were the gifts?