Part IV (Tertia Pars) Part 103 (2/2)
But matrimony was inst.i.tuted before sin, as may be seen in Gen. 2.
Therefore sacraments were necessary to man before sin.
_On the contrary,_ None but the sick need remedies, according to Matt. 9:12: ”They that are in health need not a physician.” Now the sacraments are spiritual remedies for the healing of wounds inflicted by sin. Therefore they were not necessary before sin.
_I answer that,_ Sacraments were not necessary in the state of innocence. This can be proved from the rect.i.tude of that state, in which the higher (parts of man) ruled the lower, and nowise depended on them: for just as the mind was subject to G.o.d, so were the lower powers of the soul subject to the mind, and the body to the soul. And it would be contrary to this order if the soul were perfected either in knowledge or in grace, by anything corporeal; which happens in the sacraments. Therefore in the state of innocence man needed no sacraments, whether as remedies against sin or as means of perfecting the soul.
Reply Obj. 1: In the state of innocence man needed grace: not so that he needed to obtain grace by means of sensible signs, but in a spiritual and invisible manner.
Reply Obj. 2: Man's nature is the same before and after sin, but the state of his nature is not the same. Because after sin, the soul, even in its higher part, needs to receive something from corporeal things in order that it may be perfected: whereas man had no need of this in that state.
Reply Obj. 3: Matrimony was inst.i.tuted in the state of innocence, not as a sacrament, but as a function of nature. Consequently, however, it foreshadowed something in relation to Christ and the Church: just as everything else foreshadowed Christ.
_______________________
THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 61, Art. 3]
Whether There Should Have Been Sacraments After Sin, Before Christ?
Objection 1: It seems that there should have been no sacraments after sin, before Christ. For it has been stated that the Pa.s.sion of Christ is applied to men through the sacraments: so that Christ's Pa.s.sion is compared to the sacraments as cause to effect. But effect does not precede cause. Therefore there should have been no sacraments before Christ's coming.
Obj. 2: Further, sacraments should be suitable to the state of the human race, as Augustine declares (Contra Faust. xix). But the state of the human race underwent no change after sin until it was repaired by Christ. Neither, therefore, should the sacraments have been changed, so that besides the sacraments of the natural law, others should be inst.i.tuted in the law of Moses.
Obj. 3: Further, the nearer a thing approaches to that which is perfect, the more like it should it be. Now the perfection of human salvation was accomplished by Christ; to Whom the sacraments of the Old Law were nearer than those that preceded the Law. Therefore they should have borne a greater likeness to the sacraments of Christ. And yet the contrary is the case, since it was foretold that the priesthood of Christ would be ”according to the order of Melchisedech, and not ... according to the order of Aaron” (Heb.
7:11). Therefore sacraments were unsuitably inst.i.tuted before Christ.
_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (Contra Faust. xix) that ”the first sacraments which the Law commanded to be solemnized and observed were announcements of Christ's future coming.” But it was necessary for man's salvation that Christ's coming should be announced beforehand.
Therefore it was necessary that some sacraments should be inst.i.tuted before Christ.
_I answer that,_ Sacraments are necessary for man's salvation, in so far as they are sensible signs of invisible things whereby man is made holy. Now after sin no man can be made holy save through Christ, ”Whom G.o.d hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in His blood, to the showing of His justice ... that He Himself may be just, and the justifier of him who is of the faith of Jesus Christ”
(Rom. 3:25, 26). Therefore before Christ's coming there was need for some visible signs whereby man might testify to his faith in the future coming of a Saviour. And these signs are called sacraments. It is therefore clear that some sacraments were necessary before Christ's coming.
Reply Obj. 1: Christ's Pa.s.sion is the final cause of the old sacraments: for they were inst.i.tuted in order to foreshadow it. Now the final cause precedes not in time, but in the intention of the agent. Consequently, there is no reason against the existence of sacraments before Christ's Pa.s.sion.
Reply Obj. 2: The state of the human race after sin and before Christ can be considered from two points of view. First, from that of faith: and thus it was always one and the same: since men were made righteous, through faith in the future coming of Christ. Secondly, according as sin was more or less intense, and knowledge concerning Christ more or less explicit. For as time went on sin gained a greater hold on man, so much so that it clouded man's reason, the consequence being that the precepts of the natural law were insufficient to make man live aright, and it became necessary to have a written code of fixed laws, and together with these certain sacraments of faith. For it was necessary, as time went on, that the knowledge of faith should be more and more unfolded, since, as Gregory says (Hom. vi in Ezech.): ”With the advance of time there was an advance in the knowledge of Divine things.” Consequently in the old Law there was also a need for certain fixed sacraments significative of man's faith in the future coming of Christ: which sacraments are compared to those that preceded the Law, as something determinate to that which is indeterminate: inasmuch as before the Law it was not laid down precisely of what sacraments men were to make use: whereas this was prescribed by the Law; and this was necessary both on account of the overclouding of the natural law, and for the clearer signification of faith.
Reply Obj. 3: The sacrament of Melchisedech which preceded the Law is more like the Sacrament of the New Law in its matter: in so far as ”he offered bread and wine” (Gen. 14:18), just as bread and wine are offered in the sacrifice of the New Testament. Nevertheless the sacraments of the Mosaic Law are more like the thing signified by the sacrament, i.e. the Pa.s.sion of Christ: as clearly appears in the Paschal Lamb and such like. The reason of this was lest, if the sacraments retained the same appearance, it might seem to be the continuation of one and the same sacrament, where there was no interruption of time.
_______________________
FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 61, Art. 4]
Whether There Was Need for Any Sacraments After Christ Came?
Objection 1: It seems that there was no need for any sacraments after Christ came. For the figure should cease with the advent of the truth. But ”grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17). Since, therefore, the sacraments are signs or figures of the truth, it seems that there was no need for any sacraments after Christ's Pa.s.sion.
Obj. 2: Further, the sacraments consist in certain elements, as stated above (Q. 60, A. 4). But the Apostle says (Gal. 4:3, 4) that ”when we were children we were serving under the elements of the world”: but that now ”when the fulness of time” has ”come,” we are no longer children. Therefore it seems that we should not serve G.o.d under the elements of this world, by making use of corporeal sacraments.
Obj. 3: Further, according to James 1:17 with G.o.d ”there is no change, nor shadow of alteration.” But it seems to argue some change in the Divine will that G.o.d should give man certain sacraments for his sanctification now during the time of grace, and other sacraments before Christ's coming. Therefore it seems that other sacraments should not have been inst.i.tuted after Christ.
<script>