Volume III Part 56 (1/2)
Mr. MOSHER of Dover said: There ought to be a new motion gotten up; to ”indefinitely postpone” is getting to be stereotyped. This bill needs no further championing. Its justice is apparent.
Mr. HOBBS of Ossippee said: If women are capable of holding office they are also capable of saying who shall hold it.
[Applause.]
Mr. PATTEN of Manchester favored the bill and hoped the motion of Mr. Whicher would be voted down.
The SPEAKER [Mr. WOOLSON of Lisbon] said: The bill had pa.s.sed the Senate unanimously, been reported unanimously by the committee, and he hoped it would be pa.s.sed promptly by the House.
[Applause.]
Mr. PATTERSON of Hanover said he would congratulate the gentleman from Bethlehem on being orthodox on this question.
Mr. SINCLAIR congratulated his friend from Hanover on his display of courage in waiting until the ice was broken all round before making a forward step.
Mr. Whicher withdrew his motion to postpone and then moved to lay the bill upon the table. This being lost, the bill was pa.s.sed, August 8, 1878. Mrs. White, the president of the State a.s.sociation, in a letter to a friend, wrote as follows:
To our surprise and delight the bill allowing women to vote at school-district meetings pa.s.sed the House yesterday amid much cheering and clapping of hands, the ladies in the gallery joining in the demonstration. Thus conservative New Hamps.h.i.+re leads New England in this branch of reform for women.
The governor, B. F. Prescott, signed the bill without delay and words of cheer poured into the capital city from all quarters; especially were Mr. and Mrs. White congratulated upon this good result of their earnest and persistent labors. The following is from the _Woman's Journal_:
At the first election at the State capital of New Hamps.h.i.+re under the new law allowing women to vote on school questions, the result was a wonderfully full vote, not less than 2,160 ballots being cast, of which over half were deposited by women. The Boston _Investigator_, from which we gather these facts, says:
The balloting extended over three meetings and the number of women who partic.i.p.ated was almost exactly doubled on the second and third evenings--150, 299, 662. Another interesting feature of this election was the fact that the s.e.xes did not rally to the support of opposing tickets, but men and women divided their votes very evenly. A ticket bearing the names of two men was elected by a narrow majority over another which bore the names of a man and woman.
Of the first evening's election the telegraphic dispatch to the _Boston Globe_ was headed, ”Crowds of Women Voting in New Hamps.h.i.+re”:
CONCORD, N. H., March 22.--The occasion of the annual meeting of the Union-school district of this city, which comprises all of the city proper, this evening, was one of unprecedented interest. For months school matters have been sharply agitated and the election has been looked forward to as an opportunity by all parties. To the uncommon interest centered in the matter the right of women to vote at school meetings, delegated by the last session of the legislature, greatly added. The new condition of affairs had been fully canva.s.sed and the women had determined on making the best of their first opportunity and winning a decisive victory if possible. The night of the meeting proved inauspicious, but notwithstanding the severe storm of snow and sleet that was falling the newly const.i.tuted citizens were out in force. At the hour of opening the meeting the City Hall was packed to suffocation, 500 of the audience, at least, being ladies.
The first business was the choice of a moderator, and in this the ladies may claim a victory, as the candidate a majority of them supported was elected in the person of ex-mayor John Kimball. After this came the reading of the report of the board of education, which was strenuously objected to by the male supporters of the ladies. In this they were beaten by a large majority. The reading completed, the meeting commenced to ballot for three members of the board. The scene then became one beyond the power of the reportorial pen to describe. It was an old-fas.h.i.+oned New Hamps.h.i.+re town-meeting, with the concomitant boisterousness and profanity subdued by the presence of the ladies. A line was formed to the polls and a struggling ma.s.s of humanity in which male and female citizens were incongruously and indecorously mixed, surged towards the ballot-box. The crowding, squeezing and pus.h.i.+ng were severe enough for the taste of the masculine voter, and were harsh enough to make it extremely unpleasant for the dear creatures who were undergoing so much to cast their maiden vote. To add to the delay the Hon. Nathaniel White had planted his somewhat corpulent form directly in front of the ballot-box and stayed the surging tide to shake hands with every woman that voted. Having voted, the men were only too glad to leave the crowded hall and let the anxious crowd rush in. The vote was at last all in, and the work of counting completed shortly before 11 o'clock. It was found that there were some ten different tickets in the field, and forty-two candidates voted for; but from this ma.s.s of votes there was no choice, though the regular candidates, the outgoing members of the board, who would have been elected had it not been for the new element in the election, were ahead, having a plurality.
The meeting was then adjourned till next Sat.u.r.day evening, when the scenes of to-night will be intensified by a larger attendance and still greater interest. The meeting to-night obtains importance in New Hamps.h.i.+re, as this is the center of female suffrage sentiment in this State, and the women are determined to win here if possible.
In the opening convention of November 5, 1879, Mrs. White, the president, made the following address:
_Ladies and Gentlemen, Friends of the N. H. Woman Suffrage a.s.sociation_: We hold the seventh meeting of this a.s.sociation under circ.u.mstances that mark an epoch in the progress of equal rights, irrespective of s.e.x, in this State. After more than a decade of agitation, and pet.i.tioning of our legislature, women hold in their hand the ballot on one important matter. Let us exchange congratulations on this occasion, that so much has been gained toward the final triumph of our cause.
You will remember when this a.s.sociation was last in session, July, 1878, that the bill giving the women of New Hamps.h.i.+re the right to vote on the public-school questions, was pending in our legislature. At our first hearing before that body, we hardly dared antic.i.p.ate the pa.s.sage of the bill during that session. But agitation, vigilance and perseverance ever bring their sure reward in the end, therefore we continued to press our claim, and soon learned to our great satisfaction that our allies in behalf of this bill, were the very _cream_ of our legislature. We at once took courage, and as day after day we went up to the state-house, with friends who plead for it before the committee, who kindly gave us several hearings; we saw the gradual growth of interest in behalf of this bill soon ripen into a final decision causing it to pa.s.s; thereby enacting a law, to which our worthy governor, B. F. Prescott, immediately gave his willing signature, securing to the women of this State the high privilege many of them gladly exercised last spring. Many feared this law would be repealed; but to show with what favor it has been received, we have only to refer to the legislature of the present year, which pa.s.sed an additional law, giving to women not only the right to vote for and serve on school boards, but also the power to serve as moderator or clerk in school meetings, for which the former law did not provide. This, it would seem must remove all fears of a repeal.
Pet.i.tions asking munic.i.p.al suffrage for women, were sent to our last legislature, and a bill to that effect, introduced in the House, was referred to a special committee, who reported in its favor: and after more or less discussion, although the bill did not pa.s.s, about one hundred members voted for it, and their names are registered, and with the committee, will be kindly remembered by those women whose cause they did not desert. From past experience we see the importance of continued labor and proper measures for the accomplishment of our work. The present degree of progress indicates the fact that we are not to obtain the full recognition of our rights at one bound, but that they are coming step by step. To note the growth of our principles in the various reform movements, let us look at the temperance organizations throughout the length and breadth of this country; we find nearly all of them now discussing the ballot for women. Why, no sooner had Ma.s.sachusetts, following the example of New Hamps.h.i.+re, obtained the school ballot for women, than the Woman's Christian Temperance Unions all over the State were a unit for the temperance ballot, and the past year have had their agents canva.s.sing the State in the interest of school suffrage and ”home protection.”
All who read the reports last winter of Frances E. Willard's labors in Illinois in behalf of her Home Protection bill (for it originated with her), of the list of pet.i.tioners of both s.e.xes she secured and took to Springfield, of the delegation of women who accompanied her there to advocate her bill, must acknowledge the educating force of all such untiring devotion for the right to vote. Although she was not victorious, she was successful beyond all expectation, for it is said, ”Success is not always a victory, nor is victory always a success in the end.” Let me say here, Miss Willard believes in the entire enfranchis.e.m.e.nt of her s.e.x, but in her earnest and faithful labors makes a specialty of the temperance ballot.
At the annual meeting of the New Hamps.h.i.+re Woman's Christian Temperance Union, held here one year ago, a resolution was offered by a most worthy lady, indorsing suffrage for women on all temperance questions. It was at once vigorously opposed by some, while others, although believing in it, feared it would divide their ranks if it pa.s.sed, and felt too timid to give it their support. The lady offering it, seeing it would be defeated, withdrew it, at the same time giving notice that she should present the same, or one similar, to that body every year as long as she lived, or until it pa.s.sed. Last month the same organization held its annual meeting in Portsmouth, and that lady, as good as her word, was there with her resolution on temperance suffrage, and it pa.s.sed unanimously, about 100 delegates being present and voting, many of whom acknowledged the timidity they felt last year, but now earnestly gave it their support. Such experiences give us some idea of the different instrumentalities by which our cause is forced upon conservative minds for consideration, ending in honest conviction.
In closing, I know you will all unite with me in tributes to Mr.
Garrison. Now that he has gone to join that innumerable host of philanthropists in the higher life, let us rejoice that he was one of the leaders of that reform which brings us here to-day.
And now, friends, in view of the present status of our cause, have we not much to encourage us in our work? May we go forward in that spirit of good-will that shall bring us a speedy victory.
Resolutions of respect to the memory of Mrs. Abby P. Ela, William Lloyd Garrison and Angelina Grimke Weld were adopted by a rising vote.
In the _National Citizen_ of December 14, 1879, we find the following:
Marilla M. Ricker of New Hamps.h.i.+re had an executive hearing before the governor and council of that State, November 18, in regard to the management of the State prison. Mrs. Ricker, who in winter practices law in Was.h.i.+ngton, and is known as ”the prisoner's friend,” referred to the cruel treatment of convicts in various States, notably in New Hamps.h.i.+re, where prisoners are not permitted to read the magazines or the weekly newspapers which contain no record of crime, nor to receive words from their friends, as in other States they are allowed at stated times to do. When Mrs. Ricker desired to see a certain prisoner and let him know he had friends who were yet mindful of his comfort, the warden replied that he did not wish that man ”to think he had a friend in the world.” Mrs. Ricker warmly protested against such brutality. The attorney-general agreed with Mrs. Ricker, remarking that the line between crimes punished and those not punished, and the lines between those in prison and those outside who ought to be there, were so dim and shadowy that great care should be exercised in order to secure just and humane treatment for prisoners. Mrs. Ricker's remarks were earnest and dignified, and were listened to with the closest attention by the governor and his official advisers. At the close of the hearing the governor referred the subject to the special prison committee of the council, directing its members to procure all possible information as to the management of penitentiaries in other States, and report at the next meeting. Through Mrs. Ricker's influence the last legislature pa.s.sed an act providing that any convict may send sealed letters to the governor or council without their being read by the warden.
In 1882 a judicial decision in New Hamps.h.i.+re recognized the advance legislation of that State in regard to the position of married women. This decision shows that they are no longer under the shadow of the old common law, but now hold equal dignity and power as individuals and joint heads in family life. The ”divinely ordained head,” with absolute control in the home, to rule according to his will and pleasure, is at last ruled out of the courts altogether, as the following case ill.u.s.trates: