122 Chapter 122 Public Dispute (seeking subscription recommendation) (1/2)

”Roman Polanski won the nomination for best director. His character has nothing to do with art, let alone affect the Oscar selection.”

”The Pianist was nominated for seven awards, and the Oscar judges expressed a clear attitude of favor. What will the final result be?”

”Nicole Kidman vs. Renee Zellweger, who can get the best actress?”

””Chicago” is huge and has unlimited scenery.”

”Hollywood starts the Harvey-Weinstein era? Is it a vision or what to be nominated for Oscar for Best Picture?”

”The All the Time” has caused controversy? In order to ensure Nicole Kidman's competitive advantage, he helped Meryl Streep to declare the best supporting actress?”

......

Over the years, the Oscar nomination list has always grabbed a wave of entertainment headlines, and this year is no exception. On the second day of the nomination dinner, all relevant newspaper press releases have been published.

However, what is slightly different from previous years is that compared with awards such as Best Picture, Best Male Lead or Female Lead, people's attention this year is undoubtedly on a controversial movie like ”The Pianist”.

The director's evil behavior obviously made them feel uncomfortable. What's more uncomfortable is that the nomination advantage of ”The Pianist” is still very good?

”Can it really get a big prize?” All the gossip sections are concerned about this issue, because this kind of thing is really too topical to discuss.

When various newspapers made predictions about the attribution of this year’s Oscars, the gambling company also opened a corresponding handicap: Roman Polanski’s winning odds rose slightly after the scandal broke out, reaching as high as 1. : 2.5. This shows that they are also very optimistic about the award for the tainted director. After all, the Academy judges of the Oscars don't know what they are going crazy, they are very supportive.

In the battle for the best director, another popular candidate to win the award is Martin Scorsese of ”New York Gangs” with an odds of 1:3, which is 0.5 points more than Roman Polanski. .... In addition, the odds of the escorts in the eyes of the other three gambling companies are all 1:5 or 1:10 or more. This also shows how the professionals in the circle think about this award. Assessed.

And Harvey-Weinstein’s Miramax’s top picks have always been the best film, which is also in line with their company’s profit maximization considerations. Of course, this is also something that the industry knows.The gambling company's daring to make this odds evaluation also shows their self-confidence. They have always had great abilities.

And the odds of ”Three Fools in Bollywood” in the best foreign language film handicap are even more amazing, at 1:1.5, the odds...Zhi, I don’t know, I thought they were just The public relations team behind it is more confident than the CAA.

However, it also means that they are really optimistic that the film can go to the end, because ”Three Fools Havoc in Bollywood” is a typical work with strong regional atmosphere, which has a certain degree in the selection of the best foreign language film. Advantages, and more importantly, CAA and Paramount Pictures are supporting such a film.

Is it for ”outsiders” or half of ”owners”, do I still choose this option?Especially those old stubborn academics who like to engage in local characteristics and treat differently.

Take the famous ”Jewish” theorem.

Actors of Jewish ancestry can always get a lot in Oscars and get more performance opportunities than others.

Many people are rumoring that half of Hollywood is controlled by Jewish forces. This is not a lie.

They are also more willing to help their own people. This seems unfair to many people, but it is a means by which Jews live in Hollywood, in the United States, or elsewhere.

Although it is inevitable that there will be discrepancies, but the Jewish group is well-known, especially in the showbiz, where personal connections can better determine the allocation of resources.

It has become an instinct for them to help each other. For example, Harvey Weinstein, he can have such an influence on the Oscars, not only is good ability, but also the role played by blood and the same ethnicity during this period. But it is extremely important.

Similarly, there are Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson. Their smooth and open actor careers also illustrate this point.

As for why the two of them are not like Jewish people, it is because the ethnic view that the Jews agree with depends on the matrilineal line. By coincidence, their mother is Jewish, but their father is not.

Counting on this phenomenon, Marilyn Monroe, Gotti Han, Kate Hudson, and many other actresses are outstanding.

It is undeniable that their strength and beauty, but the most important thing is still the continuous support of the nobles.

This sense of cultural identity and intimacy is self-evident, and it can't even be said of cheating or anything. People simply put it on the surface.