Part 14 (1/2)

72. De Becker, G. (1997). The Gift of Fear. New York: Dell.

73. Batson, C.D., Thompson, E.R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., and Strongman, J.A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 52537.

74. Batson, C.D., Thompson, E.R., and Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 33039.

75. Miller, G. (2000). The Mating Mind: How s.e.xual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.

76. Burling, R. (1986). The selective advantage of complex language. Ethology and Sociobiology 7: 116.

77. Smith, P.K. (1982). Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human play. Behavioral Brain Science 5: 13984.

78. Byers, J.A., and Walker, C. (1995). Refining the motor training hypothesis for the evolution of play. American Naturalist 146: 2540.

79. Dolhinow, P. (1999). Play: A critical process in the developmental system. In Dolhinow, P., and Fuentes, A. (eds.), The Non-Human Primates (pp. 23136). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publis.h.i.+ng.

80. Pellis, S.M., and Iwaniuk, A.N. (1999). The problem of adult play-fighting: A comparative a.n.a.lysis of play and courts.h.i.+p in primates. Ethology 105: 783806.

81. Pellis, S.M., and Iwaniuk, A.N. (2000). Adult-adult play in primates: Comparative a.n.a.lyses of its origin, distribution and evolution. Ethology 106: 10831104.

82. pinka, M., Newberry, R.C., and Bekoff, M. (2001). Mammalian play: Training for the unexpected. Quarterly Review of Biology 76: 14167.

83. Palagi, E., Cordoni, G., and Borgognini Tarli, S.M. (2004). Immediate and delayed benefits of play behaviour: New evidence from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ethology 110: 94962.

84. Keverne, E.B., Martensz, N.D., and Tuite, B. (1989). Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relations.h.i.+ps. Psychoneuroendocrinology 14: 15561.

85. Henzi, S.P., and Barrett, L. (1999). The value of grooming to female primates. Primates 40: 4759.

Chapter 4: THE MORAL COMPa.s.s WITHIN.

1. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108: 81434.

2. Westermarck, E.A. (1891). The History of Human Marriage. New York: Macmillan.

3. Shepher, J. (1983). Incest: A Biosocial View. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

4. Wolf, A.P. (1966). Childhood a.s.sociation and s.e.xual attraction: A further test of the Westermarck hypothesis. American Anthropologist 70: 86474.

5. Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2002). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 81926.

6. Nunez, M., and Harris, P. (1998). Psychological and deontic concepts: Separate domains or intimate connection? Mind and Language 13: 15370.

7. Call, J., and Tomasello, M. (1998). Distinguis.h.i.+ng intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (h.o.m.o sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 112: 192206.

8. Fidd.i.c.k, L. (2004). Domains of deontic reasoning: Resolving the discrepancy between the cognitive and moral reasoning literature. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 5A: 44774.

9. Free Soil Union. Ludlow, VT, September 14, 1848.

10. Macmillan, M., ponents: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 83955.

18. Chartrand, T.L, and Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 893910.

19. Ambady, M., and Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-a.n.a.lysis. Psychological Bulletin 111: 25674.

20. Albright, L., Kenny, D.A., and Malloy, T.E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 38795.

21. Chailen, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cures in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 75266.

22. Cacioppo, J.T., Priester, J.R., and Berntson, G.G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of att.i.tudes, II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on att.i.tudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 517.

23. Chen, M., and Bargh, J.A. (1999). Nonconscious approach and avoidance: Behavioral consequences of the automatic evaluation effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 21524.

24. Thomson, J.J. (1986). Rights, Rest.i.tution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

25. Greene, J., et al. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 21058.

26. Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds. New York: HarperCollins.

27. Borg, J.S., Hynes, C., Horn, J.V., Grafton, S., and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences, action and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 80317.

28. Amati, D., and Shallice, T. (2007). On the emergence of modern humans. Cognition 103: 35885.

29. Haidt, J., and Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 138 (Autumn): 5566.

30. Haidt, J., and Bjorklund, F. (in press). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.), Moral Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31. Shweder, R.A., Much, N.C., Mahapatra, M., and Park, L. (1997). The ”big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the ”big three” explanations of suffering. In Brandt, A., and Rozin, P. (eds.), Morality and Health (pp. 11969). New York: Routledge.

32. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In Davidson, R.J., Scherer, K.R., and Goldsmith, H.H. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 85270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33. Frank, R.H. (1987). If h.o.m.o economicus could choose his own utility function, would he want one with a conscience? American Economic Review 77: 593604.

34. Kunz, P.R., and Woolcott, M. (1976). Season's greetings: From my status to yours. Social Science Research 5: 26978.

35. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, J., and Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7: 34680.

36. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review 86: 65360.