Part IV (Tertia Pars) Part 28 (1/2)
_On the contrary,_ It is written (Jer. 14:8): ”Why wilt Thou be as a stranger in the land, and as a wayfaring man turning in to lodge?”
_I answer that,_ A man is called a wayfarer from tending to beat.i.tude, and a comprehensor from having already obtained beat.i.tude, according to 1 Cor. 9:24: ”So run that you may comprehend [Douay: 'obtain']”; and Phil. 3:12: ”I follow after, if by any means I may comprehend [Douay: 'obtain']”. Now man's perfect beat.i.tude consists in both soul and body, as stated in the Second Part (I-II, Q. 4, A.
6). In the soul, as regards what is proper to it, inasmuch as the mind sees and enjoys G.o.d; in the body, inasmuch as the body ”will rise spiritual in power and glory and incorruption,” as is written 1 Cor. 15:42. Now before His pa.s.sion Christ's mind saw G.o.d fully, and thus He had beat.i.tude as far as it regards what is proper to the soul; but beat.i.tude was wanting with regard to all else, since His soul was pa.s.sible, and His body both pa.s.sible and mortal, as is clear from the above (A. 4; Q. 14, AA. 1, 2). Hence He was at once comprehensor, inasmuch as He had the beat.i.tude proper to the soul, and at the same time wayfarer, inasmuch as He was tending to beat.i.tude, as regards what was wanting to His beat.i.tude.
Reply Obj. 1: It is impossible to be moving towards the end and resting in the end, in the same respect; but there is nothing against this under a different respect--as when a man is at once acquainted with what he already knows, and yet is a learner with regard to what he does not know.
Reply Obj. 2: Beat.i.tude princ.i.p.ally and properly belongs to the soul with regard to the mind, yet secondarily and, so to say, instrumentally, bodily goods are required for beat.i.tude; thus the Philosopher says (Ethic. i, 8), that exterior goods minister ”organically” to beat.i.tude.
Reply Obj. 3: There is no parity between the soul of a saint and of Christ, for two reasons: first, because the souls of saints are not pa.s.sible, as Christ's soul was; secondly, because their bodies do nothing by which they tend to beat.i.tude, as Christ by His bodily sufferings tended to beat.i.tude as regards the glory of His body.
_______________________
QUESTION 16
OF THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO CHRIST IN HIS BEING AND BECOMING (In Twelve Articles)
We must now consider the consequences of the union; and first as to what belongs to Christ in Himself; secondly, as to what belongs to Christ in relation with His Father; thirdly, as to what belongs to Christ in relation to us.
Concerning the first, there occurs a double consideration. The first is about such things as belong to Christ in being and becoming; the second regards such things as belong to Christ by reason of unity.
Under the first head there are twelve points of inquiry:
(1) Whether this is true: ”G.o.d is man”?
(2) Whether this is true: ”Man is G.o.d”?
(3) Whether Christ may be called a lordly man?
(4) Whether what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated of the Son of G.o.d, and conversely?
(5) Whether what belongs to the Son of Man may be predicated of the Divine Nature, and what belongs to the Son of G.o.d of the human nature?
(6) Whether this is true: ”The Son of G.o.d was made man”?
(7) Whether this is true: ”Man became G.o.d”?
(8) Whether this is true: ”Christ is a creature”?
(9) Whether this is true: ”This man,” pointing out Christ, ”began to be”? or ”always was”?
(10) Whether this is true: ”Christ as man is a creature”?
(11) Whether this is true: ”Christ as man is G.o.d”?
(12) Whether this is true: ”Christ as man is a hypostasis or person”?
_______________________
FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 16, Art. 1]
Whether This Is True: ”G.o.d Is Man”?
Objection 1: It would seem that this is false: ”G.o.d is man.” For every affirmative proposition of remote matter is false. Now this proposition, ”G.o.d is man,” is on remote matter, since the forms signified by the subject and predicate are most widely apart.